Showing posts with label import duties and tariffs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label import duties and tariffs. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Tracking the impact of Trump’s tariffs on US households. Really!

The use of tariffs by President Trump is certainly controversial! It runs counter to the enormous efforts and successes since the end of WW II to implement free trade among the nations.

However, there appears to be ample evidence that a lot of countries or e.g. the EU have also implemented e.g. non-tariff barriers to trade (e.g. climate change regulations) etc. over the decades. Or what about the "transshipment scam" (example Spain, Canada)? Thus undermining the principle of free trade!

However, notice that The John Locke Foundation and the Tax Foundation engage in some journalistic dishonesty. The huge extra government revenues due to the imposition of new tariffs is barely mentioned. How much US businesses and households suffered from the above mentioned trade restrictions imposed by other countries appears to be omitted (a typical case of "That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen" fallacy made famous by Frederic Bastiat)

A reversal in the trade balance takes more than 12 months that is why it did not happen in 2025! Plus other than tariff factors may influence the trade balance of a country. Why "a reversal"? This is not required!

"The Tax Foundation is out with a new report summarizing the key economic impacts from Pres. Donald Trump’s tariff regime, kicked off by his “Liberation Day” announcement on April 2, 2025.

In short, the Tax Foundation analysts found that Trump’s tariffs have: imposed significant costs on U.S. households, harmed GDP, did not reduce America’s trade balance, and amounted to the largest tax increase since 1993.

Here is a summary of their key findings:

The Trump tariffs amounted to an average tax increase of $1,000 per US household: According to Tax Foundation analysis, the tax burden passed along to U.S. households amounted to an average of $1,000 per household in 2025. They project this burden will be $900 per household this year.
..."

"... Tariffs did not reverse the trade balance: One of the top stated goals of Trump’s tariff regime was to reverse America’s trade balance. A negative trade balance, of course, is not a reflection of a poor economy and can largely reflect sizeable foreign investment, as the country is seen as a profitable place to invest. Indeed, the U.S. has experienced negative trade balances for fifty years. After the implementation of Trump’s tariffs, the overall trade balance dropped by just $2.1 billion. The trade deficit in goods, however, actually deepened by $25.5 billion in 2025. ..."

Tracking the impact of Trump’s tariffs

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Why Tarifflation in the US Never Lived Up the Panic

Food for thought! Yes, higher tariffs can be compensated in different ways other than raising output/product prices.

"... Research published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston on Wednesday [8/19/2026] finds that productivity growth accelerated in industries most heavily affected by tariffs—and that this largely offset the higher costs firms in those industries faced.

Industries in which tariffs induced higher costs in 2025 also experienced greater labor productivity growth, which helped them mitigate those higher costs,” the researchers explain. ..."

Breitbart Business Digest





Friday, July 24, 2026

New US Tariffs on 60 countries, Including in Europe and China, for goods produced with forced labor inspired by US Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's dissent

Good news! A very interesting angle to impose import tariffs! 

Will President Trump try to go down in history as an abolitionist? Way to go!

How serious is modern slavery or indentured servitude or similar arrangements/conditions around the world even today at the end of the first quarter of the 21st century?

Caveat: I am not familiar with the details of President Trump's latest imposition of tariffs.

"... Trump imposed the latest tariffs, ranging from 10-12.5 percent, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. They follow an investigation under Section 301 finding failure to prevent the importation of goods as a result of forced labor in the respective countries.

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 is one of the pathways forward that Kavanaugh highlighted in the dissent when the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s worldwide International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which he imposed on April 2, 2025. ..."

"Today, Ambassador Jamieson Greer is taking final action, at President Trump’s direction, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 by imposing tariffs on 60 economies for their failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.  Today’s action comes after the Office of the United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) investigations, which included two rounds of public hearings, more than 2,100 public comments, and engagement with our trading partners to remedy these longstanding concerns.

President Trump recognizes that decades of moral suasion have not eradicated forced labor from global supply chains.  The United States has had a forced labor import ban for nearly a century, and rigorously enforces it; it’s well past time for our trading partners to do the same,” said Ambassador Greer.  “Today’s action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and distortive trade practice to improve the welfare of workers everywhere.  I am encouraged by the trading partners who have moved quickly to adopt forced labor import prohibitions, and look forward to ensuring their effective enforcement.” ..."

U.S. Tariffs 60 Trading Partners, Including Europe and China, for Slave Labor Product Imports "United States Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer on Thursday announced “tariffs on 60 economies for their failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.”"

Trump’s Tariffs on 60 Countries Adopt Method Justice Brett Kavanaugh Laid Out in SCOTUS Ruling "The tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed on 60 countries Thursday night utilize one of the mechanisms that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh laid out in the dissent of February’s Supreme Court ruling striking down Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs."


Trump's Newest Tariffs Are Likely Illegal Too (a critical voice) "The Section 301 tariffs announced on Thursday overstep the powers granted by Congress and likely run afoul of the major questions doctrine."

Sunday, May 10, 2026

19 WTO Members Agree Among Themselves Not to Impose E-Commerce Duties

Good news! President Trump is not only about raising tariffs! 😊

"“The U.S. and ‌more than a dozen other countries including Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Australia on Thursday launched their own pact to not impose duties on e-commerce after no agreement was reached to end deadlock with Brazil, a document showed. ..."

19 WTO Members Agree Among Themselves Not to Impose E-Commerce Duties - Human Progress