Showing posts with label polygamy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label polygamy. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Rethinking polygamy/polyandry – new research upends conventional thinking about the advantages of monogamous marriage

Have you ever wondered why LGBTQ+ is without a P for polygamy? Are there old taboos that even the LGBTQ community would not touch? 😊

What is wrong with polygamy/polyamory if anything? Should the choice of partnership not be a right or freedom as well?

This research seems largely focused on a few countries in Africa. This by itself may introduce some issues casting doubts like that other factors (e.g. cultural) might be involved etc..

"... men in high-polygyny populations usually marry more than men in low-polygyny ones ..." Of course, any man would be a fool not to marry quickly before less single women are available! A matter of competition?

"... In the vast majority of cases, polygamy takes the form of one husband and multiple wives – more precisely referred to as polygyny, originating from the Greek words “poly” (“many”) and “gynē” (“woman or wife”). The opposite arrangement of one wife and multiple husbands is referred to as polyandry (from “anēr” meaning “man” or “husband”) and is exceedingly rare worldwide. ...

Critics of polygyny present two main arguments. First, they contend it squeezes low-status men out of the marriage market, fostering social unrest, crime and violence against women by frustrated unwed men. Second, it harms women and children by dividing limited resources among more dependents.

This logic has led leading political scientist Rose McDermott to describe polygyny as evil. Other researchers, such as anthropologist Joseph Henrich, even go as far as to credit Christianity’s derision of polygyny as a driving force of Western prosperity. ...

However, a trio of new studies, all relying on the highest standards of data analysis, contend that these arguments are misguided. ...

A new study published in October 2025 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences presents the first comprehensive, large-scale analysis of polygyny and men’s marriage prospects. The project is a collaboration between demographer Hampton Gaddy and evolutionary anthropologists Rebecca Sear and Laura Fortunato.

The researchers drew on demographic modeling and an extraordinary trove of census data – over 84 million records from 30 countries in Africa, Asia and Oceania, plus the entire U.S. census from 1880, when polygyny was practiced in some American communities. They demonstrate that polygyny does not lock large numbers of men out of marriage. In fact, in many contexts, men are actually more likely to marry where polygyny is common than where it is rare. ...

Women typically live longer than men, men frequently marry younger women, and populations in many parts of the world are growing, ensuring younger spouses are available for older cohorts. These factors, which are characteristic of many contemporary African nations, tilt the marriage market toward a surplus of women. Under many realistic conditions, a sizable proportion of men can have multiple wives without leaving their peers out in the cold. ...

a study that uses a detailed, longitudinal dataset from a 20-year prospective study in another region of Tanzania. Analyzing survival, growth and education for thousands of children, they found no evidence that monogamous marriage is advantageous. ...

Another recent study ... goes further, suggesting that polygyny has unrecognized advantages when times are tough.

Drawing on crop yield data from over 4,000 farm households across Mali, census data on marriage patterns and detailed meteorological records, they found that in villages where polygyny is rare, droughts cut harvests dramatically. But in villages where polygyny is common, that blow is softened. ..."

Rethinking polygamy – new research upends conventional thinking about the advantages of monogamous marriage








Figure 2.Distribution of Polygyny and Drought in Africa (Source)


Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Tracing the Sexual Revolutions: How the Assault on Marriage Is Destroying Democracy. Really!

Sometimes it is quite amusing when conservatives muse about sex!

When biblical connotations are abused!

The invention of the oral contraceptive pill in 1960 must pure horror to this man! 

"In October 2022, a New York City judge decided that polyamorous relationships — that is, sexual-romantic relationships involving more than two persons — were entitled to the same legal protections as relationships of two persons. ...

How did we get here? After all, wasn’t it just a decade ago that same-sex marriage proponents — my friend Jonathan Rauch for example — were dismissing conservative arguments that expanding marriage’s definition would eliminate any possible principled ground for declining to extend the same rights and recognition to polyamorous and polygamous relationships?

In his powerful and timely book Sex and the Citizen: How the Assault on Marriage Is Destroying Democracy, Conn Carroll makes a compelling case that our contemporary cultural woes in the realm of marriage, gender, and sexuality are ultimately the fruit of the same poisonous tree [???]: the sexual revolution of the mid-to-late 20th century. ..."

Tracing the Sexual Revolutions | American Enterprise Institute - AEI


Robert P. George







Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Elon Musk juggles raising at least 14 children with four women

A little bizarre. Smells of modern polygamy. Is he a loving father and husband/partner when married or living with a domestic partner?

A genius can sometimes be very difficult to live with. For many normal mortals this can be a challenge.

He married and divorced the same woman twice. Besides spouses, he also had a domestic partner. (Source)

"His longtime fixer, Jared Birchall, handles the financial and privacy deals Musk wants for the women raising the world’s richest man’s babies. Nondisclosure clauses are part of some of the payment agreements. WSJ explores the billionaire entrepreneur’s world of pronatalism, sperm donations and the recruitment of potential mothers."

The Wall Street Journal What's news

Sunday, March 23, 2025

A proposed legalisation of polygamy in Australia

Are there Mormons living or proselytizing in Australia? What about polyandry?

What are they up to down under? 😊

Taking a cue from the Kiwis: "In the Mead v Paul NZFLR 75 Supreme Court of New Zealand case, the court ruled that a polyamorous relationship, or "throuple," can be considered a series of two-person relationships for the purposes of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976, allowing for the division of relationship property among all parties."

"The [NZ] Supreme Court decision essentially said that the relationship of Fiona, Lilach, and Paul can be broken down into three individual relationships of two people – i.e. Fiona and Lilach, Fiona and Paul, and Lilach and Paul – all occurring simultaneously."

"... “Polygamy has been demonstrated throughout Australia’s history amongst certain Indigenous Australian communities and certain Muslim migrants,”  ..."

From the abstract:
"This article examines the history of polygamy, globally and particularly within Australia. It traces the emergence of marriage as an institution, including the institutionalisation of monogamy and displacement of polygamy as a social norm in most parts of the Western world.
It finds that polygamy can be an egalitarian practice when its foundations are not religious, regardless of whether those enjoying the practice are themselves religiously motivated. The article proposes for the legalisation of polygamy under the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) and Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) — the two primary Australian statues governing marriages. Modelled on the Supreme Court of New Zealand’s decision in Mead v Paul [2023] NZFLR 75, this article proposes to recognise polygamous marriages — those between three or more persons — as sets of couples."

A proposed legalisation of polygamy in Australia | Newsroom | University of Adelaide "Polygamy — a legally or customarily recognised marriage involving three or more people — is currently illegal in Australia. However, new research suggests a way to legalise the practice without disrupting the foundations of Australian marriage law."



Two possible configurations of polygamy. Figure 2 is described as preferred and proposed for legalisation in Australia


Thursday, April 04, 2024

Polygamy is non-binary

Why is the letter P like polygamy not part of LGBTQ? Feminists don't like it? What is the resistance to polygamy by LGBTQ about? Is polyarmory enough?

Why don't we encourage and allow women to have two or more husbands in the name of gender equality?

What if someone's gender identity calls for multiple wives or husbands? To deny such a need constitutes structural oppression or does it not?

Caution: satire

Senegal New President Two Wives - Unconventional First Family? Here's Why

Why is P like polygamy not part of LGBTQ? Why don't we allow women to have two or more husbands in the name of gender equality? Different stroke for different folks! Caution: satire
According to this video, polygamy is widespread in Senegal.
South Africa's President Jacob Zuma also had two wives.

Which one will be the First Lady! The new and young president has a dilemma!


Wednesday, April 03, 2024

Polygamous Mormon leader pleads guilty and admits to taking child brides in Utah

Why is the letter P like polygamy not included in LGBTQ? They don't like Mormons? (Caution: satire)

"Members of a new offshoot of the polygamous Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints have started taking plea deals in federal court and admitting their roles in providing child “brides” to their leader, Samuel Bateman. ..."

Samuel Bateman: Polygamous leader pleads guilty and admits to taking child brides

Thursday, February 23, 2023

LGBTQ has been running out of letters, but still without the letter P

Why was the letter P for polygamy never officially added to LGBTQ? Just scratching my head! 😊 

Is the LGBTQ community against polygamy? Are they not inclusive? No diversity? What about equity?

Could it be the LGBTQ community does not like the Mormons?


Thursday, January 26, 2023

Poet Eliza Snow, the plural wife of prophets who fought for polygamy, women

I like that headline!

Is it not curious that the LGBTQ community does not embrace polygamy/polyandry? It is actually very curious omission!

"Eliza R. Snow — poet, preacher, president and plural wife of prophets Joseph Smith and Brigham Young — was a staunch defender of polygamy.
“She spoke about the curse of Eve and overcoming the fall through plural marriage,” historian Jennifer Reeder said ..."

"Eliza Roxcy Snow (January 21, 1804 – December 5, 1887) was one of the most celebrated Latter Day Saint women of the nineteenth century. A renowned poet, she chronicled history, celebrated nature and relationships, and expounded scripture and doctrine. ..."

"... Do you know of any place on the face of the earth,” she asked in 1870, “where woman has more liberty, and where she enjoys such high and glorious privileges as she does here, as a Latter-day Saint?” [Maybe there is a kernel of truth in this statement]  ...
Her obituary in the New York Times described her as “one of the central figures of the Mormon galaxy.” ..."

‘Mormon Land’: Historians discuss poet Eliza Snow, the plural wife of prophets who fought for polygamy, women

Eliza R. Snow (Source: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints)

Wednesday, January 04, 2023

History of the Mormons | 10 Things You probably Don't Know About

Very recommendable!
Joseph Smith's wife Emma Smith threatened him to take multiple husbands and she did, because her husband had affairs and other wives (Footnote: The Wikipedia article about her does not mention her polygamy. The video also does not mention the source for this claim)!
Mormons committed a massacre of 120 pioneers traveling in a wagon train in 1857 first using natives and Mormons dressed as natives, then pretending to be rescuers.
Mormons ran brothels in Salt Lake city to entrap politicians who were opposed to polygamy.
Mormons built and financed Las Vegas strip not withstanding the mob!

Emma Smith


Sunday, December 04, 2022

Polygamous leader Samuel Bateman had 20 wives, according to FBI. A cause for Polygamy to be added to LGBTQ

Do you trust the FBI anymore? What if the FBI undercounted? 😊

I propose, the letter P for polygamy ought to be added to LGBTQ to become LGBTQP! Would make sense to me! An inclined individual could then proudly claim e.g. I am non-binary and polygamous and my other polygamists are drag queens (Caution: satire)

Caveat: I do not condone whatever Samuel Bateman did or not did or what he is accused of.

Polygamous leader Samuel Bateman had 20 wives, according to FBI Sexual misconduct, including with underage girls, is alleged in FBI affidavit that details recordings from Bateman and other statements

Wednesday, October 05, 2022

Heritage Foundation on ‘Time Has Arrived’ to Legalize Polygamy, Writes New York Judge

The subject of polygamy serves well to distinguish conservatives and classical liberals!

Probably few classical liberals would oppose polygamy! If several adults voluntarily decide get married with each other, because of love and desire to be close together, then why not. Should legalized polygamy later turn out to be a disaster, it can be reversed.

Conservatives like to mix in the debate all kinds of horror scenarios like adult incest or pedophilia or instability for children and so on. These are vivid imaginations, but wrong headed.

"... The media laughed off the conservative movement’s concerns about the slippery slope when Democrats pushed to sexualize the military 20 years ago. Now, almost two decades later, with American parents in the fight of their lives over transgenderism and judges paving the way for “plural marriage,” it unfortunately proves we were right. The LGBT’s fight was never about marriage—it was about every social norm

Back in 2003, the late Justice Antonin Scalia warned of a day when state laws “based on moral choices” against “bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution … adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity” would all fall. ...

An astonishing 23% of the American public thinks polygamy is “morally acceptable” in 2022, Gallup shows—more than triple what it was (7%) ...

And why not? If “love” and “consent” are all that define a relationship, then proponents of incest, pedophilia, and group marriage can follow the LGBT playbook all the way to validity. ..."

‘Time Has Arrived’ to Legalize Polygamy, Writes New York Judge

Thursday, July 21, 2022

The legal definition of marriage in the U.S.

In my opinion, the legal definition of marriage should be left to the individual states and DC. 

I am not sure why the Members of the U.S. Congress need to get involved other than to grab more power over We the People's lives! I am not an expert on the U.S. Constitution, but I assume this kind of legislation is actually unconstitutional! I think, this kind of legislation is grand standing for no good purpose!

What if e.g. the citizens of Utah vote for reestablishing polygamy and other questions?

"Forty-seven House Republicans voted Tuesday in support of a Democrat-backed bill to codify same-sex marriage into federal law.
The bill, dubbed the Respect for Marriage Act, passed the House of Representatives 267 to 157. All 220 Democrats voted in favor. Seven Republicans abstained.
The Respect for Marriage Act would formally repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which recognized marriage as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” The 1996 law was effectively invalidated by the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, but it has remained on the books."

Here Are the 47 House Republicans Who Voted to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Notes on 2 Massachusetts Towns Create Legal Polyamorous Partnerships

When a leading Christian conservatives like Tony Perkins (current President of the Family Research Council) uses blatant demagoguery to make his point! I am not even sure Mr. Perkins really speaks for the majority of  Christian conservatives in America.

For the purpose of this blog post, I mean to understand polygamy/polyamory as the consensual, romantic, and voluntary partnership between unrelated adults.

For Mr. Perkins polygamy/polyamory is akin to Sodom and Gomorrah! He compares or alludes polygamy to "adult incest", "bestiality, and obscenity" and "pedophilia". He even uses/abuses a quote of the late Supreme Justice Antonin Scalia for his purposes. This is extreme and deplorable agitation! 

In his conclusion: "Once a culture rejects God’s design, basic biology, and thousands of years of civilization, there are no boundaries."
Nobody knows what God's design is not least Mr. Perkins! What a pretense, what a blasphemy! Of course, there are boundaries and they are well defined by (natural) law in e.g. in the Ten Commandments!

2 Massachusetts Towns Create Legal Polyamorous Partnerships

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

How polygamy helped Utah women get the right to vote

Recommendable! What a story! Utah was the first state to introduce voting rights for women in 1870! To link polygamy and suffrage in such a way as happened in this article is a feminist plot!

"And as the national battle over polygamy continued, Congress stripped Utah women of their suffrage in 1887. They would regain the right to vote when Utah became a state in 1896."

Utah/Mormons should have never given up polygamy to become a state of the union!

How polygamy helped Utah women get the right to vote - The Salt Lake Tribune

Monday, January 01, 2018

Major Federal Breaches Of Religious Freedom In The U.S.

Posted: 1/1/2018


This is a work in progress!


Motivation


If you think religious freedom in America was only threatened, attacked, and abridged in our days you are seriously mistaken.


In The Words Of Thomas Jefferson


Excerpted from Thomas Jefferson’s Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (1777; emphasis added):
  1. “... That the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavouring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time; ...”
  2. “... That therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence, by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages, to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right, ...”
  3. “... Be it enacted by General Assembly that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief, but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of Religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge or affect their civil capacities.”


What would Thomas Jefferson have to say today about religious freedom in America?


A Brief History Of Federal Violations Of The First Amendment


A brief history of federal breaches of religious freedom:
  1. Why did it take Utah almost 50 years to become the 45th state of the union in 1896? Why was Utah forced by Washington to give up polygamy in return for statehood? Utah tried since 1850 to become a state, but was repeatedly denied. President Buchanan removed Brigham Young as governor of Utah Territory in 1857-58. He sent a 2,500-man army and a new governor to Utah.
    In 1862, the U.S. Congress passed the Morrill Anti-bigamy Act. This Act prohibited polygamy in the territories and disincorporated the LDS church. President Lincoln signed this unconstitutional act into law. For many other reasons, Lincoln was a terrible president (see my blog posts about Lincoln).
    In 1874, the U.S. Congress passed the Poland Act, which gave authorities more power to successfully prosecute polygamists.
    In 1879, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of federal laws against polygamy (Reynolds v. United States). So the law making plural marriage a crime was found to be valid. Another, very dubious, but lesser known, unconstitutional decision by the U.S. Supreme Court!
    In 1882, Congress passed the Edmunds Anti-Polygamy Act, outlawing “unlawful cohabitation.” thus removing the need to prove that actual marriages had occurred. The act declared polygamy a felony. It also banned polygamists from voting, holding public office, or serving on juries. Wow, this would be called religious persecution in our days! In 1885, federal officials chased and arrested lots of polygamists—while others went into hiding. The Mormons presented President Cleveland with a formal protest—to no avail. The Edmunds Act restrictions were enforced regardless of whether an individual was actually practicing polygamy, or merely stated a belief in the Mormon doctrine of plural marriage without actually participating. It also provided for a five-man Utah Commission appointed by the president to supervise all aspects of the electoral process in Utah Territory.The Supreme Court ruled, in Murphy v. Ramsey (1885), that the statute was not ex post facto because convicts were charged for their continued cohabitation, not for the prior illegal marriage.
    In 1887, Congress passed the Edmunds-Tucker bill. This would confiscate LDS church property and take away the right of Utah women to vote. So the women in Utah had voting rights since 1870 and Congress took that away too. I was truly stunned to learn about this.The Supreme Court in the case Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States that upheld the Edmunds–Tucker Act in 1890
    [No matter what one thinks about polygamy, did the U.S. Congress and several U.S. Presidents violate religious liberty as protected by the U.S. Constitution when they pursued the Mormons? I am afraid, they did! Only forced or involuntary polygamy should have been the basis of any federal law. What this harsh pursuit of the Mormons represents is a severe violation of We the People and federalism! This should never have happened in the history of the U.S.! There are parallels to the American Civil War fought over the secession of southern states.]
  2. Jehovah's Witnesses story. Why were the Jehovah’s Witnesses harassed so much that they sued so often like probably no other religious organisation in the history of the U.S. (to be continued)



Sources:

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Marriage Is A Truly Private Affair

What’s Next?

Now that marriage between same sex partners is all but sanctioned by government, we wonder what comes next?
Will we soon see the legalization of polygamy (polygyny or polyandry)? Will humans marry animals? Other suggestions?
What would be wrong with this?

Keep Government Out Of This As Much As Possible

Why is government so much involved in marriage anyway? To protect the institution? From a nationalistic perspective: To insure population growth and social stability?

The only legitimate role I can see for government as far as marriage is concerned is to record a special relationship between two perhaps more human beings. E.g. any preferential tax treatment for how people live together or not should be abolished. No personal relationship between humans should be given any preferential treatment by government.

Someone might interject: What about the children? Self evidently, Children deserve some kind of protection by the government, but this does not require the government condoning certain human relationships or not. The welfare of children can be addressed by the government without any recourse to the underlying relationship of humans.

A Truly Private Affair

It should be left to exclusively to the individual to decide with whom the individual wants to spend his/her life together in a hopeful a meaningful relationship.

It is up to the individuals involved that should be able to decide for themselves whether to register their relationship at all with the government or not.

It should be up to the individuals involved to decide whether or how they get married (civil or church etc.)?