A Libertarian Think Tank Calls For The Federal
Government To Fix
The Excesses Of State & Local Governments
To my surprise Mr. Carl DeMaio
of the Reason Foundation thinks the US Congress could just pass a few laws and $3
trillion of unfunded, very generous pension promises for state & local public
sector employees go away. Mr. DeMaio cites as one example the San Diego
librarian who will receive $234,000 annual pension. Don’t we all want to be
librarians?
About The Reason Foundation
In their own words:
“Reason Foundation advances a
free society by developing, applying, and promoting libertarian principles,
including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law. … Reason
Foundation's nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition,
and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress.”
I suppose this op-ed by one of
their experts is nothing but an aberration.
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Pages
I am not sure what the editor,
Mr. Paul Gigot, was thinking when he allowed this piece to be published on
these pages.
Back To The Arguments Presented In The Op-ed
Mr. DeMaio thinks that the federal
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, which “exempted the pension
systems of state and local governments.” was the big mistake. He does not seem
to realize that this Act itself was a big government intervention into the
private sector. The first question should be why employers ought to provide any
kind of pensions and if they do it is their voluntary choice? Just the name of
this Act “Income Security Act” should make every serious libertarian cringe and
taking into account that this law was passed during high inflationary times.
He argues that “[federal] Lawmakers
could begin by imposing tough financial-disclosure rules on state and local
pension systems. Without tough Erisa standards for financial accounting and
disclosure of costs, too many state and local pension boards have cooked their
books.” Do we really want even more centralization at the federal level? Is it
not better overextended public pension funds go into bankruptcy for their lies
for all to see and to learn the lessons?
He speaks of federal opportunities:
“Congress's opportunity, then, is to tweak the Internal Revenue Code to
discourage the use of pension obligation bonds—for example, by eliminating tax
exemptions for any state or locality that issues them.” Are there not already enough
“tweaks” in the Internal Revenue Code? We need a fundamental tax reform
(preferably a simple flat tax) not tweaks. He is right that there should have
never been any such special tax exemptions for municipalities or other
government or private entities. Such tax exemptions usually create distortions.
