Showing posts with label black hole. Show all posts
Showing posts with label black hole. Show all posts

Sunday, December 01, 2024

Astrophysicists Use black hole light Echoes to Illuminate Black Holes

Amazing stuff! However, it may require a space based interferometer.

"A team of astrophysicists ... has developed an innovative technique to search for black hole light echoes. Their novel method, which will make it easier for the mass and the spin of black holes to be measured, represents a major step forward, since it operates independently of many of the other ways in which scientists have probed these parameters in the past.

The research ... introduces a method that could provide direct evidence of photons circling black holes due to an effect known as “gravitational lensing.” ..."

From the abstract:
"Light passing near a black hole can follow multiple paths from an emission source to an observer due to strong gravitational lensing. Photons following different paths take different amounts of time to reach the observer, which produces an echo signature in the image. The characteristic echo delay is determined primarily by the mass of the black hole, but it is also influenced by the black hole spin and inclination to the observer. In the Kerr geometry, echo images are demagnified, rotated, and sheared copies of the direct image and lie within a restricted region of the image. Echo images have exponentially suppressed flux, and temporal correlations within the flow make it challenging to directly detect light echoes from the total light curve. In this Letter, we propose a novel method to search for light echoes by correlating the total light curve with the interferometric signal at high spatial frequencies, which is a proxy for indirect emission. We explore the viability of our method using numerical general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a near-face-on accretion system scaled to M87-like parameters. We demonstrate that our method can be used to directly infer the echo delay period in simulated data. An echo detection would be clear evidence that we have captured photons that have circled the black hole, and a high-fidelity echo measurement would provide an independent measure of fundamental black hole parameters. Our results suggest that detecting echoes may be achievable through interferometric observations with a modest space-based very long baseline interferometry mission."

Astrophysicists Use Echoes of Light to Illuminate Black Holes - Press Release | Institute for Advanced Study

Measuring Black Hole Light Echoes with Very Long Baseline Interferometry (open access)


Due to gravitational lensing, the photons from a single flash of light near a black hole follow winding paths. Some follow the trajectory of the blue line, where they take a direct path to the observer. Others orbit around the black hole once, following the path of the red dashed line. Others still orbit the black hole twice following the green dashed line. Because the different paths all have different time delays, the photons arrive one after another in sequence, and the original flash of light will appear to echo.


Saturday, August 31, 2024

Dark matter could have helped make supermassive black holes in the early universe

Recommendable! Amazing stuff! A universe of mysteries!

"Key takeaways
  • Supermassive black holes typically take billions of years to form. But the James Webb Space Telescope is finding them not that long after the Big Bang — before they should have had time to form.
  • ... astrophysicists have discovered that if dark matter decays, the photons it emits keep the hydrogen gas hot enough for gravity to gather it into giant clouds and eventually condense it into a supermassive black hole.
  • In addition to explaining the existence of very early supermassive black holes, the finding lends support for the existence of a kind of dark matter capable of decaying into particles such as photons.
... Why, then, is the James Webb Space Telescope discovering supermassive black holes near the beginning of time itself, eons before they should have been able to form? ... astrophysicists have an answer as mysterious as the black holes themselves: Dark matter kept hydrogen from cooling long enough for gravity to condense it into clouds big and dense enough to turn into black holes instead of stars. ..."

From the abstract:
"We investigate the formation of high-redshift supermassive black holes (SMBHs) via the direct collapse of baryonic clouds, where the unwanted formation of molecular hydrogen is successfully suppressed by a Lyman-Werner (LW) photon background from relic particle decay. We improve on existing studies by dynamically simulating the collapse, accounting for the adiabatic contraction of the DM halo, as well as the in situ production of the LW photons within the cloud which reduce the impact of the cloud’s shielding. We find a viable parameter space where the decay of either some of the dark matter or all of a subdominant decaying species successfully allows direct collapse of the cloud to a SMBH."

Dark matter could have helped make supermassive black holes in the early universe | UCLA "Radiation from dark matter may have kept hydrogen gas hot enough to condense into black holes"

Direct Collapse Supermassive Black Holes from Relic Particle Decay (no public access)


A view of the Milky Way supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* in polarized light.


Thursday, August 01, 2024

Colored Black Holes Explained with Mack O'Dowd

Very recommendable! Mind boggling! Primordial black holes, extremal black holes ... What happened in under one second after the Big Bang!

Friday, May 24, 2024

Supermassive black hole spin measured for the first time

Amazing stuff! Head spinning too! 😊

It appears neither the author of the popular science article nor the researchers actually measured how long one spin takes. Odd?

"... The new method, detailed in a paper published in Nature, involves observations of the “wobbling” stellar material left over from the black hole’s consumption. ...
Analysis showed the black hole spinning at less than 25% the speed of light – relatively slow for a black hole. The new method for measuring black hole spin could help determine the spin rates for hundreds of nearby black holes. ..."

From the abstract:
"An accretion disk formed around a supermassive black hole after it disrupts a star is expected to be initially misaligned with respect to the equatorial plane of the black hole. This misalignment induces relativistic torques (the Lense–Thirring effect) on the disk, causing the disk to precess at early times, whereas at late times the disk aligns with the black hole and precession terminates. Here we report, using high-cadence X-ray monitoring observations of a tidal disruption event (TDE), the discovery of strong, quasi-periodic X-ray flux and temperature modulations. These X-ray modulations are separated by roughly 15 days and persist for about 130 days during the early phase of the TDE. Lense–Thirring precession of the accretion flow can produce this X-ray variability, but other physical mechanisms, such as the radiation-pressure instability, cannot be ruled out. Assuming typical TDE parameters, that is, a solar-like star with the resulting disk extending at most to the so-called circularization radius, and that the disk precesses as a rigid body, we constrain the disrupting dimensionless spin parameter of the black hole to be 0.05 ≲ ∣a∣ ≲ 0.5."

Supermassive black hole spin measured for the first time


Extended Data Fig. 7: A simplified schematic of a potential model showing Lense-Thirring precession of an inner disk.


Monday, February 12, 2024

Thursday, February 16, 2023

Did black holes form right after the Big Bang?

Recommendable! Given that the Big Bang theory overall is actually quite implausible, black holes may help to expose this inconvenient fact! What came before the Big Bang? God?

"We still don’t know how the first black holes formed — or when they formed. To have gotten as big as they seem to be today, they may have emerged right after the universe was formed, a new study concludes. ...
The oldest black hole we know of is 13.80 billion years old, forming just 690 million years after the big bang. It’s also a massive black hole, at 800 million times the mass of the Sun. ...
How did a black hole so massive form so early in the universe, what did it form from? Plus, it’s unlikely that we found the oldest black hole, there are possibly even older ones out there, and our current understanding of the universe struggles to explain something like that. Meanwhile, on the other end of the scale, there could be some small early black holes (as highlighted by observations from ESA’s Gaia). These black holes seem too small to have formed from stars, so how did they form exactly? ..."

From the abstract (I have to admit this is a tough one loaded with technical terms etc. and no attempt to explain the relevance to a non-expert audience):
"We explore the observational implications of a model in which primordial black holes (PBHs) with a broad birth mass function ranging in mass from a fraction of a solar mass to ∼106 M⊙, consistent with current observational limits, constitute the dark matter (DM) component in the universe. The formation and evolution of dark matter and baryonic matter in this PBH-Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) universe are presented. In this picture, PBH-DM mini-halos collapse earlier than in standard ΛCDM, baryons cool to form stars at z ∼ 15–20, and growing PBHs at these early epochs start to accrete through Bondi capture. The volume emissivity of these sources peaks at z ∼ 20 and rapidly fades at lower redshifts. As a consequence, PBH DM could also provide a channel to make early black hole seeds and naturally account for the origin of an underlying DM halo–host galaxy and central black hole connection that manifests as the Mbh–σ correlation. To estimate the luminosity function and contribution to integrated emission power spectrum from these high-redshift PBH-DM halos, we develop a halo occupation distribution model. In addition to tracing the star formation and reionization history, it permits us to evaluate the cosmic infrared and X-ray backgrounds. We find that accretion onto PBHs/active galactic nuclei successfully accounts for the detected backgrounds and their cross-correlation, with the inclusion of an additional IR stellar emission component. Detection of the deep IR source count distribution by the James Webb Space Telescope could reveal the existence of this population of high-redshift star-forming and accreting PBH DM."

Did black holes form right after the Big Bang?: How did they get so big in such a "short" time?

Sunday, December 11, 2022

Mysteriously bright flash in February like from 1,000 trillion suns is a black hole jet pointing straight toward Earth from 8.5 billion light years away

Amazing stuff!

"... when they detected an extraordinary flash in a part of the sky where no such light had been observed the night before. From a rough calculation, the flash appeared to give off more light than 1,000 trillion suns. ...
Over the next few days, multiple telescopes focused in on the signal to gather more data across multiple wavelengths in the X-ray, ultraviolet, optical, and radio bands, to see what could possibly produce such an enormous amount of light.
Now, the ... astronomers ... have determined a likely source for the signal. ... the scientists report that the signal, named AT 2022cmc, likely comes from a relativistic jet of matter streaking out from a supermassive black hole at close to the speed of light. They believe the jet is the product of a black hole that suddenly began devouring a nearby star, releasing a huge amount of energy in the process. ...
Astronomers have observed other such “tidal disruption events,” or TDEs, in which a passing star is torn apart by a black hole’s tidal forces. AT 2022cmc is brighter than any TDE discovered to date. The source is also the farthest TDE ever detected, at some 8.5 billion lights years away — more than halfway across the universe. ...
AT 2022cmc is the fourth Doppler-boosted TDE ever detected and the first such event that has been observed since 2011. It is also the first TDE discovered using an optical sky survey. ..."

"... And on February 11 this year [2022] it spotted an ... incredibly bright spot of light flared up in an area where there’d been nothing the night before. ..."

From the abstract:
"A black hole can launch a powerful relativistic jet after it tidally disrupts a star. If this jet fortuitously aligns with our line of sight, the overall brightness is Doppler boosted by several orders of magnitude. Consequently, such on-axis relativistic tidal disruption events have the potential to unveil cosmological (redshift z > 1) quiescent black holes and are ideal test beds for understanding the radiative mechanisms operating in super-Eddington jets. Here we present multiwavelength (X-ray, UV, optical and radio) observations of the optically discovered transient AT 2022cmc at z = 1.193. Its unusual X-ray properties, including a peak observed luminosity of ≳1048 erg s−1, systematic variability on timescales as short as 1,000 s and overall duration lasting more than 30 days in the rest frame, are traits associated with relativistic tidal disruption events. The X-ray to radio spectral energy distributions spanning 5–50 days after discovery can be explained as synchrotron emission from a relativistic jet (radio), synchrotron self-Compton (X-rays) and thermal emission similar to that seen in low-redshift tidal disruption events (UV/optical). Our modelling implies a beamed, highly relativistic jet akin to blazars but requires extreme matter domination (that is, a high ratio of electron-to-magnetic-field energy densities in the jet) and challenges our theoretical understanding of jets."

Mysteriously bright flash is a black hole jet pointing straight toward Earth, astronomers say | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology The observations could illuminate how supermassive black holes feed and grow.



Fig. 1: AT 2022cmc’s X-ray evolution on various timescales at different epochs. (Nature Astronomy only provides these low resolution images! Very regrettable!)


Sunday, April 18, 2021

Telescopes Unite in Unprecedented Observations of Famous Black Hole

Very recommendable! Amazing stuff! An amazing, coordinated global effort!

"... The NASA telescopes involved in this observing campaign included the Chandra X-ray Observatory, Hubble Space Telescope, Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), and the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. ...
The sequence begins with the EHT [Event Horizon Telescope] image of the black hole in M87 released in April 2019 (the data was obtained in April 2017). It then moves through images from other radio telescope arrays from around the globe, moving outward in the field of view during each step. ... Next, the view changes to telescopes that detect visible light (Hubble and Swift), ultraviolet light (Swift), and X-rays (Chandra and NuSTAR). .."

Telescopes Unite in Unprecedented Observations of Famous Black Hole Some of the world’s most powerful telescopes simultaneously observed the supermassive black hole in galaxy M87, the first black hole to be directly imaged.

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

First black hole ever found is more massive than previously thought

Very recommendable! This research may be very consequential! Astonishing large corrections! Science or fiction? Or how unsettled is scientific knowledge? We are reminded of Karl Popper's Criterion of Falsifiability! As so often, when new technologies are being used, scientific knowledge is expanded and revised!

Perhaps, we ought to build a very large array of radio dishes on the moon?

"... New observations of the black hole–star pair called Cygnus X-1 indicate that the black hole weighs about 21 times as much as the sun — nearly 1.5 times heavier than past estimates. The updated mass has astronomers rethinking how some black hole–forming stars evolve. For a star-sized, or stellar, black hole that massive to exist in the Milky Way, its parent star must have shed less mass through stellar winds than expected ...
Stephen Hawking famously bet physicist Kip Thorne that the Cygnus X-1 system, discovered in 1964, did not include a black hole — and conceded the wager in 1990, when scientists had broadly accepted that Cygnus X-1 contained the first known black hole in the universe ...
Astronomers got a new look at Cygnus X-1 using the Very Long Baseline Array, or VLBA. This network of 10 radio dishes stretches across the United States, from Hawaii to the Virgin Islands, collectively forming a continent-sized radio dish. ...
The new observations suggest that Cygnus X-1 is about 7,200 light-years from Earth, rather than the previous estimate of about 6,000 light-years. This implies that the star in Cygnus X-1 is even brighter, and therefore bigger, than astronomers thought. The star weighs about 40.6 suns, the researchers estimate. The black hole must also be more massive in order to explain its gravitational tug on such a massive star. The black hole weighs about 21.2 suns — much heftier than its previously estimated 14.8 solar masses, the scientists say.
The new mass measurement for Cygnus X-1’s black hole is so big that it challenges astronomers’ understanding of the massive stars that collapse to form black holes ..."

First black hole ever found is more massive than previously thought | Science News Cygnus X-1 is the heaviest stellar black hole observed without using gravitational waves

Here is the link to the referenced paper:

Saturday, January 09, 2021

After decades of effort, scientists are finally seeing black holes—or are they?

Very recommendable! Excellent summary article on black holes research of the past several decades! And it includes alternative theories about black holes and more.

"... Like a bell, the black hole would oscillate at one main frequency and multiple overtones ... The oscillations would quickly fade as the black hole radiated gravitational waves—ripples in the fabric of space itself. ...
In February 2016, experimenters with the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), a pair of huge instruments in Louisiana and Washington, reported the first observation of fleeting gravitational ripples, which had emanated from two black holes, each about 30 times as massive as the Sun, spiraling into each other 1.3 billion light-years away. LIGO even sensed the “ring down”: the shudder of the bigger black hole produced by the merger. Teukolsky’s old thesis was suddenly cutting-edge physics. ...
Gravitational wave detectors have spotted four dozen black hole mergers since LIGO’s breakthrough detection. In April 2019, an international collaboration called the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) produced the first image of a black hole. By training radio telescopes around the globe on the supermassive black hole in the heart of the nearby galaxy Messier 87 (M87) ... Meanwhile, astronomers are tracking stars that zip close to the black hole in the center of our own Galaxy, following paths that may hold clues to the nature of the black hole itself. ...
The smaller black holes detected by LIGO and, now, the European gravitational wave detector Virgo in Italy have proved heavier and more varied than expected, straining astrophysicists’ understanding of the massive stars from which they presumably form. And the environment around the supermassive black hole in our Galaxy appears surprisingly fertile, teeming with young stars not expected to form in such a maelstrom. But some scientists feel the pull of a more fundamental question: Are they really seeing the black holes predicted by Einstein’s theory? ..."

After decades of effort, scientists are finally seeing black holes—or are they? | Science | AAAS