Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Berthold Beitz - A Leading German Post-World War Industrialist – RIP

Another Schindler

Until today (7/31/2013) when I read here (German language) the news about passing away of Berthold Beitz, I was not aware at all that this preeminent German manager and his equally courageous wife Elsa are Righteous Among The Nations celebrated by Israel at Yad Vaschem. As a German to be recognized by Israel as a Righteous Among The Nations is probably the highest honor that any German can receive by Israel.

At the young age of 27, he and his wife risked their lives to rescue as many Jews as possible from certain death. His post-war professional career is closely associated with the German steel giants Krupp & Thyssen.

One only wishes there had been more Germans as courageous as him and his wife.

Interview With A Survivor

As his death was announced today in my home town news paper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, it also republished an interview (German language) with Mr. Jurek Rotenberg in Israel. He and his mother were saved by Mr. Beitz. It is a very touching story, but I will not go into details here.

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Federal Sex Discrimination Harassment Against Universities

Trigger

The media recently reported about a 31 page letter by the Obama Justice department to the President of the University of Montana Missoula, Montana dated 5/9/2013.

Excerpts and comments from this letter (emphasis added):
1.       “Another complaint did not result in an equitable resolution because a University official, upon reinvestigation of the complaint, used the “clear and convincing evidence” standard in contravention of the Dear Colleague Letter’s directive to use the “preponderance of the evidence” standard to evaluate the complaint. The official’s analysis of the evidence found both the complainant and accused student to be credible and expressed a belief that this was “a case of differing perceptions and interpretations of the events in question.” However, other parts of the analysis questioned the complainant’s credibility.” (p. 17)
[The Feds are directing that a weak standard should be used to evaluate such a complaint?]
2.       ”Based on the United States’ analysis of twenty-three sexual assault and ten sexual harassment complaints to the University in the past three school years, interviews and emailed responses, some of which included older allegations of sexual assault, the United States determined that the University had not fully eliminated the hostile educational environment based on sex.” (p. 23)
[Nota Bene these are only complaints not proven cases of such conduct. Nota Bene that there were a total of 33 complaints in 3 school years at a university campus of about 15,000 students. This certainly means that sexual misconduct is rampant.]
3.       “The evidence established that substantial numbers of female students at the University reported incidents of rape or sexual assault, which were sufficiently serious that they interfered with or limited their ability to participate in or benefit from the school’s program.” (p. 23)
[Again (see above), these are only a few reported not confirmed incidents. The “evidence established” nothing other than that a few incidents were reported.]
4.       “To the University’s credit, beginning in December 2011, it proactively implemented a number of campus-wide steps to address the hostile environment created by the sexual assaults, prevent further harassment, and remedy the effects of the harassment on the affected students.” (p. 24)
[Just amazing how such a small number of reported incidents creates already a “hostile environment”. This is baloney!]
5.       “Conclusion … 3. [University to] take sufficient effective action to fully eliminate a hostile environment based on sex, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects;” (p. 30)
[Since it is impossible to fully eliminate what the Feds define as a “hostile environment” this is just preposterous.]

I did not read all 31 pages in its entirety, but I believe this letter does nowhere mention whether any police investigations or disciplinary measures or even any prosecutions occurred against the alleged perpetrators of these reported incidents. This is mindboggling!

Extremely One Sided – A Modern Sorcerer Hunt

What used to be superstitious witch hunts of the past has become a modern, sophisticated sorcerer hunt.

Sexual harassment/assault and hostile environment as understood by the Feds is extremely biased in favor of the victim that makes a respective allegation. The presumption of innocence is suspended. Mere allegations suffice to create a “hostile environment”.

The legal terms involved here are particularly prone to ambiguity and interpretation. Often there are no witnesses to the incident or allegations.

Male college athletes or fraternity members are nowadays considered sexual predators and hazing is the norm.

Some Thoughts

If I were an enrolled male student at a university that subjects me to or targets me for sexual assault/harassment training etc. I would refuse to participate. This is sex harassment and an insult to my intelligence and integrity. I would not even select such a university.

It is unbelievable how the federal government comes out swinging a big stick against a university based on such a few reports of ‘sexual assault and harassment’ and to treat this university campus as if it is crime infested, bad neighborhood. This is way too much!

Instead of subjecting the whole university and student body to onerous guidelines, training, etc. the Fed

I do not understand why so few universities in the US decline to accept any federal money, federal student loans etc. to keep this outrageous federal intrusion away from their campuses. Maybe there are more such universities out there, than I realize, but I suspect they are smaller and lesser know like Hillsdale College.

Monday, July 22, 2013

Tocqueville On Self Government

Posted: 7/22/2013

A Quote From His Masterpiece

Today, I came across following quote from Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy In America (Emphasis added):
“The Anglo-Americans place moral authority in universal reason, as they do political power in the universality of citizens, and they consider that you must rely on the sense of all in order to discern what is permitted or forbidden, what is true or false.
Most of them think that knowledge of his interest well understood is sufficient to lead a man toward the just and the honest.
They believe that each person by birth has received the ability to govern himself, and
that no one has the right to force his fellow to be happy.
All have an intense faith in human perfectibility; they judge that the diffusion of knowledge must necessarily produce useful results, ignorance must lead to harmful effects;
all consider society as a body in progress; humanity as a changing scene, where nothing is or should be fixed forever, and they admit that what seems good to them today can be replaced tomorrow by something better that is still hidden.
I do not say that all these opinions are correct, but they are American.”
(Source: “CHAPTER 10: Some Considerations on the Present State and Probable Future of the Three Races That Inhabit the Territory of the United States”)

Were Tocqueville To Return Today

Tocqueville would be surprised would he come back to visit the U.S. today to see that elected big government is forcing happiness on its citizens for at least the past 113 years and that the ability to govern themselves has diminished so drastically in this country.

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Too Many Bad Deals For Americans Or Socialism Made In The US

The Past 113 Years

The more I study the history of the United States Of America, the more I realize how close the so called Country of the Free have come over the past 113 years to exceed the former Soviet Union in implementing a command and control economy and to reduce the liberties of its citizen not by violent revolution and dictatorship, but by sly gradual Socialism imposed by a strong central/federal government.

Best of all, both leading parties of the US are to blame for this development. The federal courts from bottom to top played along raising the question how independent is the judiciary from the rest of government or why did the constitutional checks and balances fail so miserably.

The Square Deal, The New Deal, The Fair Deal And More

Then there was the New Nationalism, New Freedom, Congressional Government, and later the Great Society. President Obama is the current torch bearer of this sad development.

Anyone who researches the above terms will come away that the so called Progressivism comes pretty close to Socialism and that it reigned for most part of the past 113 years of US history.

I am afraid, too many Americans live in ignorance of this because of public education.

US Non Profits Depend On Federal Big Government Largesse

Trigger

The Wall Street Journal published on 7/18/2013 an article titled “How Big Government Co-Opted Charities” (Subscribers only) by James Piereson. This is a shocking article about a special crony relationship between many non-profits/charitable organizations and the federal government. I had no idea how extensive and comprehensive this relationship is.

Summary

Basically, a large number of well known non-profits and charitable organizations receive substantial amounts of funding from the federal government making up a large part of their revenues. Without these federal funds many of these organizations would collapse. The author describes how this relationship extends the welfare state into the private sector. In return, these organizations lobby heavily in Washington for more funding etc. or support all kinds of big government legislation (e.g. ObamaCare).

E.g. According to the author backed up by a third party source (Giving USA), federal government now supplies one-third of all funds raised by not-for profit organizations. According to Giving USA Annual Report 2012 (here) individuals donated a total of $229 billion.

E.g. $215 billion of federal funds in 2010 were directed towards advocacy groups, social services organizations, and nonacademic research institutions. The AARP, a prominent and influential supporter of ObamaCare, received $97 million or 82% of its revenues in government grants in 2009. The National Council of La Raza received $16 million in 2012 and so on …

Conclusion

The author doubts that the charitable deduction in the tax code is any longer justified. In his words: “The original purpose of the deduction was to encourage charitable giving based on the belief that strong voluntary associations would reduce the need for government support.”

This Is A Government Takeover

This is an incredible nationalization of an important part of the private sector. This is an enormous redistribution of personal income by big government. It should be left to the citizens to decide when and how they spend their money. I don’t think any of the Founders would have conceived something like this happening.

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Something About Jacqueline Cochran

Who?

This is, I believe, my third blog about outstanding women in history (see here, here, and here). Jacqueline Cochran was a contemporary of Amelia Earhart, but it seems to me her history is much less known than Earhart’s, although Jacqueline’s biography as an aviator is very impressive. For brevity sake, I will not cover here her biography in detail.

Without Civil Rights Act, Sexual Harassment, And Hostile Environment

Her career did not depend on the infamous sex discrimination passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or the obscene legal theories of Sexual Harassment and Hostile environment created in the 1980s/90s basically subjecting all US businesses to federal government oversight.

I and my colleagues recently had to undergo a one hour-long required Sexual Harassment/Hostile Environment training at my current employer. I found it offensive and a harassing.

How did women like Jacqueline Cochran have such an amazing career without big government or feminism? Is it because she married a rich man, i.e. Floyd Odlum? Well this would be a sexist opinion, right? But it was somewhat similar to Amelia Earhart & George P. Putnam, who were befriended with Jacqueline Cochrane and her husband. On the other hand it was her husband who recognized Jacqueline’s talents and intelligence and supported her career. She did probably more for women in this world than any of US Congress legislative and US Supreme Court judicial excesses.

The Age Of Private Commercial Space Exploration Has Finally Arrived

Update As Of 5/20/2014

Now that private enterprises really get involved in developing space opportunities, we read almost daily about amazing new advances. See e.g. here an article in the MIT Technology Review.

To The Moon And Beyond

Today (7/20/2013), I read here that Moon Express Inc. is carrying out a major new mission to the moon. I remember other news in recent years about significant progress was being made by commercial spaceflight etc.

Finally and long overdue, private initiative and enterprise is taking over from inflexible, risk averse government bureaucracies to advance human understanding of space and to commercialize space.

Big Government Retarded Civilian Space Research & Exploration

President Eisenhower’s NASA of 1958 was a big mistake copying the Soviet Union in light of the Sputnik shock. The Europeans copied this mistake in 1975 with ESA (European Space Agency). I would argue that this route taken by the USA has unnecessarily slowed down progress in this area perhaps by decades. This was an unjustified government takeover.

Well, NASA had a predecessor called NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) established in 1915 as an emergency measure during World War I. The Wikipedia entry mentions: “On the other hand, NACA's 1941 refusal to increase airspeed in their wind tunnels set Lockheed back a year in their quest to solve the problem of compressibility in the P-38.” I would bet that this earlier federal agency had more bad influences on the development of civilian aircraft and spacecraft. This could be a research topic for the future.

More About NACA

NASA has a webpage on the history of its predecessor here. Why this page is formatted as if written with an old typewriter on wrinkled paper is a mystery to me, it reduces legibility.

Excerpts and [comments]:
1.       “Throughout the next three decades [1930s-1950s], NACA continued to expand its influence in the field of aviation by recruiting top notch engineers and scientists to work in ever larger and more [government run] advanced technological facilities.”
[Here we have a government agency competing with private enterprises for top notch engineers by offering state of the art, tax payer financed research facilities approved by government officials.]
2.       “After World War II, NACA began to work on the goal of supersonic flight.”
[Is it possible that because of NACA and the New Deal such research was delayed by years?]

3.       NACAs efforts were in a large part responsible for turning the American airplane from slow cloth-and-wood biplanes of the World War I era into the jets of today.”
[This self congratulation of a government agency is how big government would like to be perceived. Had the private sector played a larger role progress would have been faster and better.]

Still Waiting On Supersonic Transportation

In my view it is also quite possible that too much government intervention killed commercial adoption of supersonic transportation or even hypersonic transportation. How I wish I could fly in a few hours from my home in Phoenix, AZ to my hometown Frankfurt am Main, Germany at an affordable price.

I would argue that human ingenuity would by now have overcome most technical problems and it would have developed solutions to the noise pollution.

Thursday, July 11, 2013

The Abuse Of The Rule Of Law

A Quote From US President Ronald Reagan

Today (7/11/2013), the Reagan Foundation distributed following “Quote Of The Day, By Ronald Reagan” via e-mail (Emphasis added):
“Our very freedom is secure because we're a nation governed by laws, not by men.  We have the means to change the laws if they become unjust or onerous.  We cannot, as citizens, pick and choose the laws we will or will not obey.
RONALD REAGAN
9/3/1981 12:00:00 AM”

I am afraid, Ronald Reagan erred terribly here. It usually takes far too long or it will be unsatisfactory incomplete to wait for laws to be changed in a democracy like the USA.

The USA And The Rule Of Law

It is absolutely remarkable how the average American follows President Reagan’s conviction as cited above to the tee almost like a robot. The USA and few other countries (perhaps Switzerland, UK) are probably exemplary in this respect for the entire world to take a page from.

However, too many citizens of the USA lack the understanding of the difference between legal positivism and natural law thanks to widespread conformity driven public education.

The Personal Duty Of Civil Disobedience

The USA has also an impressive history of civil disobedience by individuals (e.g. Henry David Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” originally titled “Resistance To Civil Government” of 1848). Unfortunately, ever since Thoreau the concept of civil disobedience appears not to be much further developed in the USA or is it just my ignorance?

Laws are manmade. Humans are fallible. Elected lawmakers are too often attracted by and too much in love with power and control. They typically overreact. Over time laws expand, multiply, and become ever more invasive, oppressive, and intrusive. Individual liberty and responsibility requires every individual to question every law on the books.

Rule Of Universal Law

Similar to natural law, I am a proponent of universal laws like the Golden Rule or the Ten Commandments. These are in the end the ultimate laws that matter for any or all humans to live together in a civil society.

All the other laws created by humans are special laws based on special interests, paternalism, poor judgment, ignorance, and personal agendas. Most of these special laws deserve to be repealed anyway.

Limited, small government should be recognizable by and primarily founded on universal laws.

Sunday, July 07, 2013

Herbert Croly - An Influential Gradualist Socialist Of The USA

Some socialists in the USA were more influential than others. The bad influence of some of these socialists can still be felt today making a lasting mockery of the country of the free and brave. 

Mr. Croly (January 23, 1869 – May 17, 1930), of whom I have never heard before, supposedly influenced Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. His name and influence was brought to my attention by this article.

“Croley was one of the founders of modern liberalism in the United States, especially through his books, essays, and highly influential magazine founded in 1914, The New Republic.”(Wikipedia).

I will leave this blog post here as a stub and a reminder to do more research.

La Guardia - A Republican New Dealer

A New Biography

Just read the review of “City of Ambition” by Mason B. Williams written by Fred Siegel in the Wall Street Journal dated 6/28/2013. The review is titled “The New Deal's Favorite Mayor/La Guardia and FDR shared a faith in redistributive taxation, heavy-handed regulation and public works on a grand scale.”

Mr. Fiorello La Guardia was smart, witty, anti-Nazi, folksy and he had a very impressive life, but his politics were largely statist and strongly pro big government. Probably, he was a great populist.

Not least his name is e.g. associated with the big government law “Norris-La Guardia Act of 1932” that prohibited yellow-dog contracts, barred the federal courts from issuing injunctions against nonviolent labor disputes, and created a positive right of noninterference by employers against workers joining trade unions.. “LaGuardia fought for progressive income taxes, greater government oversight of Wall Street, and national employment insurance for workers idled by the Great Depression.” (Wikipedia).

Soak The Rich

Excerpts from the review(Emphasis added plus comments):
1.       “… the Depression-era relationship between Franklin Roosevelt (first as New York governor, then as president) and Fiorello La Guardia (first as congressman, then as mayor) created what is still the political culture of New York City—a kind of civic religion that was once known as "Fiorellism." If there is a problem in Gotham, the enduring Fiorellist assumption is that there must be a government solution.”
2.       “It was an unlikely pairing. Roosevelt was a Protestant, Hudson Valley squire, a Democrat. La Guardia was a half-Italian, half-Jewish, progressive Republican who had lived in Arizona and Trieste before returning to the city of his birth. The two men came to know each other in the prosperous 1920s and became strong allies in the 1930s. (Roosevelt's presidency ran from 1933 to 1945; La Guardia's mayoralty from 1934 to 1945.) They shared a disdain for businessmen that manifested itself in a faith in government regulation and redistributive taxation—and in public-works projects on a grand scale.”
[Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini also liked public works projects on a grand scale.]
3.       "It would be almost but not quite fair," wrote New Dealer Rexford Tugwell [a close confidant of FDR], "to say that he was an instinctive dictator."
4.       “La Guardia's close alliance with FDR faded with the approaching war. The city, left to its own devices and burdened by La Guardia's hostility to business, began flirting with bankruptcy again during his third and final term. City workers, given a stake in their jobs by civil service, organized 15 years later into the public-sector unions that have come to dominate civic life and ensure that, for New York City, bankruptcy is never an altogether unlikely possibility.”
[Populism and fiscal irresponsibility often go hand in hand]
5.       “La Guardia loved to shout about how we should "soak the rich."”
[In this respect, he was a great fool like most populists.]

More Advances In Mind Reading

Update

American Scientific just (10/23/2013) published a lengthy article about this subject here.

Trigger

Carnegie Mellon University reports more progress in computers reading human emotions based on neural activation patterns. Read here or here.

Excerpt from the abstract of the above PLOS paper (Emphasis added): “Method[:] actors were asked to self-induce nine emotional states (anger, disgust, envy, fear, happiness, lust, pride, sadness, and shame) while in an fMRI scanner. Using a Gaussian Naïve Bayes pooled variance classifier, we demonstrate the ability to identify specific emotions experienced by an individual at well over chance accuracy …”

Evolutionary Convergence Of Man And Machine

Major Update On 3/13/2014

I have completely revised this blog post.

Mathematicians Think Like Computers


For decades we humans have tried to make machines to think more like humans. A recent article (6/26/2013) describes how mathematicians think more like machines to check proofs.


A Bidirectional Convergence


As they say many things in life work both ways. So does the convergence of computers and humans as I expect.


Humans will continue to create computers that better understand and respond to humans. And vice versa humans will have to think and interact more like computers so computers work better for humans.


Humans Transcend Nature

Another example of how humans continue to transcend nature. I have previously blogged about this subject here.

Saturday, July 06, 2013

Big Government & Big Labor Against Poor Bangladeshis

 What A Knee Jerk Reaction By The Current Administration

On 06/28/2013 a headline in the Wall Street Journal reads “U.S. Suspends Bangladeshi’s Preferential Trade Status”. It reads (Emphasis added): “The U.S. suspended its preferential trade treatment for Bangladesh on Thursday, a largely symbolic move to punish the country for poor labor practices that attracted world-wide attention after a garment factory collapsed in April, killing more than 1,100 workers. President Barack Obama carved the South Asian country from a trade framework that eliminates certain U.S. import duties for select developing economies.  The suspension, which will begin in about 60 days, is expected to raise U.S. import duties on some Bangladeshi goods, including golf equipment and ceramics, but would have little effect on the garment industry, which dominates the country's international trade. The decision marks a victory for U.S. labor leaders, who have criticized the labor laws and worker safety in Bangladesh. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said the suspension "sends an important message to our trading partners." Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which held a hearing this month on labor issues in Bangladesh, hailed the move, saying, "We cannot and will not look the other way while workers are subjected to unsafe conditions."  Nine other Democratic senators had asked the Obama administration to impose the trade penalty, and others have called on global retailers, many based in the U.S., to take action to improve worker safety in Bangladesh. … Once Bangladesh's suspension takes effect it may not find itself singled out for long. The legislation governing GSP [Generalized System of Preferences] is set to expire at the end of July, and supporters face an "uphill battle" to renew the trade framework by then …”

Consequences Of Punishment

Let’s preface this by saying that such measures were not long ago considered to be imperialistic. It is certainly a form of interference with the domestic affairs of a sovereign nation. As a free market defender I abhor preferential treatments of any kind in foreign trade.

I am not sure why the WSJ called these punishments symbolic since they also mention that the GSPs are set to expire on 7/31/2013.

Those workers in Bangladesh whose products were singled out will be hurt. For what reason?

The WSJ also reported that US importers are already looking for other source countries for those products for which import duties are slated to rise.

Alternatives?

Western governments can certainly offer assistance to the Bangladeshi government in establishing safer workplaces etc. and how to investigate and prosecute accidents and the like.

Bangladesh’s Economic Miracle


Like China or India thanks to more free and open markets Bangladesh, one of the most densely populated and poor countries of the world, has staged a remarkable economic boom lifting millions of its population out of abject poverty. Here is what the US Trade Representative has to say about this country.

Triangle Fire - A Watershed Event For Big Government

Posted: 7/6/2013  Updated/Revised: 12/18/2018,  9/22/2016

Update Of 12/18/2018

The Smithsonian Magazine just published this article about this historic event. The article is fairly balanced and researched if you consider that this magazine often publishes rather leftist articles.

Among other things this article highlights that the factory was quite modern and well equipped and not to be confused with sweatshops of the period. “Triangle had modern well-maintained equipment, including hundreds of belt-driven sewing machines mounted on long tables and run from floor-mounted shafts.”

“... Like many other garment shops, Triangle had experienced fires that were quickly extinguished with water from pre-filled buckets that hung on the walls. Neither the owners, nor the landlord, invested in extra firefighting systems like sprinklers. While the contents of the factory were highly combustible, the building itself was considered fireproof (and survived the fire without structural damage). Triangle dealt with fire hazards to their equipment and inventory by buying insurance. Workplace safety in this period was not yet a priority.” (Emphasis added)
What the article does not say is whether there were water buckets hanging from the wall of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory. If no, why not?

In this article, we also find a link to the Cornell University story of the event here. This story is very much tainted by the usual scapegoat the capitalists narrative. Very disappointing for an ivy league university!

Update Of 9/22/2013

Just watched again an episode of the great PBS documentary on New York. In this episode (No. 4, I believe), it was reported that the first female U.S. secretary of labor (and first ever female appointed to the cabinet and longest serving secretary of labor) called the Triangle Fire the beginning of the New Deal. It was Frances Perkins, an appointee of the worst president of the 20th century, the socialist Franklin D. Roosevelt!

Original Post With Updates (If Any)
Relevance From Today’s Perspective

Well, the world news were covering at length in late April 2012 the collapsed garment worker factory in Bangladesh were more than 150 workers died.

American Experience

One is not surprised that the Public Broadcasting Service aired a documentary on the famous Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire event as part of their American Experience series. It premiered on 3/27/2012. I recently watched it (7/5/2013) for the first time (Caution: Possibly disturbing pictures and eye witness reports etc.). Nevertheless, I highly recommend to watch it.

The Tragic Accident

I will not go here into the details of this horrible event of 1911 itself. The above mentioned documentary; the website by PBS accompanying this documentary with teacher resources; and the Wikipedia entry about it provide some background.

The Aftermath

Sorry to disappoint the reader, but how proponents of big government used/abused this tragic accident to expand big government control over private businesses in the following years is such an important case study to deserve a separate blog post. This event was the opportunity, excuse, and occasion for big government advocates to become busy.

Government Failure Cover Up

Law Enforcement Did Not Prevent Brutality Against Protesters

By blaming the owners of these factories, government conveniently distracted from the fact that police officers were beating up striking seamstresses, that owner’s were able to hire goons to ‘handle’ strikers and so on. Some of this is nicely shown in the PBS documentary. In those days protests by garment workers were frequent.

The brutality against the protesters was so severe that rich women of the New York high society became concerned. The PBS documentary mentions two of them, one was the daughter of J.P. Morgan, i.e. Anne Tracy Morgan.

The Fire Department Lacked Appropriate Equipment

Not only that, as the PBS documentary so keenly shows, the New York fire department did not have the equipment to extinguish fires above the sixth floor or to rescue people trapped by a fire above the sixth floor. The Triangle factory was on the 8th floor of a 10 story building. Why was that? The PBS documentary is absolutely mute on this point. Perhaps, had the fire department had more adequate equipment fewer workers would have died in the fire?

Building Codes And Permitting

In the Wikipedia entry we read “the single exterior fire escape, which city officials had allowed Asch to erect instead of the required third staircase. It was a flimsy and poorly anchored iron structure which may have been broken before the fire.”

So were existing building codes violated and city government tolerated or ignored that?

A Possible Inept Prosecution Of The Case

According to the PBS documentary and the Wikipedia entry, the two owners were indicted on charges of first- and second-degree manslaughter and the prosecution failed to prove sufficiently that the two owners “knew the exit doors were locked at the time in question.” What were these prosecutors thinking? Perhaps that these two owners came down from their office above locked this exit door and then they escaped via the roof? Did these moronic prosecutors learn anything from the so called “PS General Slocum” passenger steam boat fire of 1904 where more than a 1,000 passengers died? It was the “worst disaster in the New York area's worst disaster in terms of loss of life until the September 11, 2001 attacks”. The captain of the boat “was convicted. He was found guilty on one of three charges: criminal negligence, failing to maintain proper fire drills and fire extinguishers. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. He spent three years and six months at Sing Sing prison … before he was pardoned by President Taft” in 1912. If years later an Al Capone can be criminally indicted on tax evasion …

The Cause Of The Fire

The Official Version

The PBS documentary and Wikipedia refer the conclusion of the official fire department investigation which said “that the likely cause of the fire was the disposal of an unextinguished match or cigarette butt in the scrap bin, which held two months' worth of accumulated cuttings by the time of the fire.”

I did not see any mentioning of an investigation into a possible intentional cause of this fire. It seems there was no investigation at all who caused the fire.

Some Speculation

I don’t want to engage in any conspiracy theories here. However, as the PBS documentary occasionally shows these were times when Socialists were very active among these garment factory workers. Street protests by these workers were frequent. We also know that anarchists were quite active sometimes resorting to violence etc. at the turn of the century. There were apparently links between Socialists, anarchists, and labor unions.

Now, here we have two owners of a garment factory in hotbed New York city of 1911 tenaciously refusing to recognize labor unions and opposing closed union shops (so, e.g., the PBS documentary). Could it be that this fire was not purely an accident? It is quite possible that the person, who we speculate, perpetrated this fire perished in this inferno, because he or she underestimated the spread etc. of the fire or the quickly ensuing panic.

Greedy Capitalists?

The PBS documentary conveys the message that the two owners of the Triangle factory refused to become a closed union shop, therefore it remained unsafe. However, as the PBS documentary shows, the two owners compromised on other union demands regarding hours and pay. Thus, the striking workers resumed their work. According the documentary, these two owners were some kind of holdout while other factory owners obliged to closed union shops. Owners who agreed to closed union shops are subject of its own, which we cannot cover here.

The PBS documentary is to be commended that at least it portrays the two owners of the factory as having come to the US as poor immigrants themselves who worked their way up.

To its credit, the PBS documentary also mentions that their factory was one of the better ones in terms of working conditions. It was brighter because of big windows and not as dirty and cramped than those “sweat shops”.

No matter how greedy a capitalist might be, I suspect only a few would probably like to have their property go up in flames and be completely destroyed. The PBS documentary mentions that the two owners collected on some kind of insurance, but, I believe, no details were given. Here is Wikipedia on this: “The jury acquitted the two men, but they lost a subsequent civil suit in 1913 in which plaintiffs won compensation in the amount of $75 per deceased victim. The insurance company paid Blanck and Harris [the two owners of the factory] about $60,000 more than the reported losses, or about $400 per casualty.”

History And Statistics

Unfortunately or as expected the American Experience documentary only bothers to mention that this fire was the worst workplace accident in New York city’s history. How many other such accidents were related to fire? How often did they occur?

And of course, because big government stepped in to control and regulate an industry etc. such deadly fires would rarely occur anymore hence. This is the accepted success narrative by big government and its adherents.

Well, Wikipedia offers a webpage with a list of historic, disastrous fires worldwide starting with antiquity. I have no idea whether this list is complete or accurate etc.

Anyway, according to this list, disastrous fires of businesses killing large numbers of workers were fairly rare worldwide in the 18th to early 20th century. If this is correct, then the big government control and regulation measures that followed the Triangle event were a typical government overreaction intensified by certain interest groups such as unions, fire fighters, building safety engineers and so on.