Showing posts with label Indo-Pacific region. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indo-Pacific region. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Believe it or not, the US doesn’t have an Indo-Pacific warfighting HQ

Bad news! This sounds almost incredible given the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941!

"US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth should decisively direct the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, to establish a dedicated theatre-level headquarters within the US Indo-Pacific Command. In doing so, Hegseth would promote the objectives of rapid reprioritisation of military resources, improved planning and revitalised alliances. ...

Since January, the second administration of President Donald Trump has issued interim national security guidance prioritising the Indo-Pacific and the challenge posed by China. ...

But even as prospects of an invasion across the Taiwan Strait become increasingly plausible, the United States lacks an Indo-Pacific command structure designed for a major theatre war. ..."

Believe it or not, the US doesn’t have an Indo-Pacific warfighting HQ | The Strategist

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

US, Australia and Japan sign trilateral naval logistics agreement

Good news!

"Australia, Japan and the United States today signed an agreement to further enhance logistics interoperability among their maritime forces, marking the first time a trilateral logistics agreement has been established among the three nations.

The move is meant to enable naval vessels from the three countries to provide logistics support for each other with areas of cooperation including the reloading of missile systems and flexible refuelling. ..."

US, Australia and Japan sign trilateral naval logistics agreement - Breaking Defense ""This arrangement strengthens those commitments and allows us to more easily share information, technologies and processes for greater logistics resiliency," said US Vice Admiral Jeff Jablon."

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

Shinzo Abe changed Japan’s meaning for Australia

Recommendable! Shinzo Abe was a transformative Western leader (here is my brief legacy on him)!

"Before Shinzo Abe, Australia’s vital economic relationship with Japan had only small, slowly evolving defence, strategic and intelligence dimensions. By the time he finished as Japan’s longest-serving prime minister, Australia and Japan were quasi-allies. ...
Abe delivered that revolution. He expanded Japan’s understanding of its regional power and international prerogatives far beyond Australia’s imaginings. In his second term as leader (2012–2020), he transformed Japan’s foreign policy; one part of that was the ‘special relationship’ with Australia.
In 2014, Abe travelled to Canberra to seal a free-trade agreement with Australia. The work had started during his first term as prime minister. After seven long years of negotiation, he made it happen, as much a statement of strategic intent as an economic partnership. ..."

Abe changed Japan’s meaning for Australia | The Strategist

Tuesday, July 13, 2021

The golden age of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue

Very recommendable! Good news! The emergence of India as a power for peace, open seas, and prosperity!

"... the strategic grouping joining Australia, India, Japan, and the United States. Since its revival in 2017 amid rising shared concerns about China, the group has consistently defied its critics and originally modest expectations. This year, the Quad has not only survived the first major change of government among its members but has thrived—not least because India, originally the most reluctant member, is now all-in on the grouping. ...
A Quad-Plus group of seven countries was later formed to , and last year, the four countries held the first Quad naval exercises in over a decade. ...
Yet, the most encouraging omen for the Quad and a major reason for its recent success lies with India’s change of heart. Once skeptical of reviving the group, New Delhi has become a driver of recent progress as it confronts an escalating rivalry with Beijing and declining confidence in its former patron, Moscow. In a stark reversal from the past, Indian officials are now some of the most vocal champions of the Quad and its conceptual cousin, the Indo-Pacific. They have also begun facing down criticism from Beijing and Moscow head-on. 
...
On one hand, India experienced growing trust and comfort cooperating with the United States and the other Quad democracies, diminished ideological attachment to its previous Cold War philosophy of nonalignment, and outspoken advocacy for the Quad and Indo-Pacific by the influential Indian minister of external affairs, S. Jaishankar. ...
One consequence of this sea change: Long-standing Chinese propaganda efforts to discourage Indian participation in the Quad are only adding fuel to the fire—not least because the language, which alternates between bullying and patronizing, only ends up emphasizing Chinese threats. In a March column, China’s Global Times warned India’s participation in the Quad meant it had become a “negative asset” to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) groupings led by Beijing and Moscow. ...
India’s views of the Quad are a product of its unique position on the geopolitical map: relatively vulnerable and alone on the western flank with its more powerful partners clustered safely together on the eastern flank. India is the only member of the Quad that borders China, has been invaded by China, has an active land border dispute with China, is wedged between two nuclear-armed rivals, and lacks treaty alliance commitments from the other Quad members. ..."

China Had Made India All-In on the Quad | The Heritage Foundation

Sunday, December 20, 2020

India's World : India-UK Looking To Enhance Partnership

Recommendable! Echoes of Britannica Rex or Rule, Britannia! Free trade agreement imminent? India is a partner of choice! India & UK are already big investors in each others country and so on 

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Britain tilts towards the Indo-Pacific

Recommendable! Echoes of Britannica Rex or Rule, Britannia!

"Last month, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a £16.5 billion (A$29 billion) increase in funding for the British Armed Forces, on top of an increase of 0.5% above inflation per year announced in the Conservative Party’s 2019 election manifesto. Combined, this means that the UK is due to ... over the next four years, potentially taking the country from the world’s sixth largest to fourth largest military spender. ...
Much of the funding will be used to push forward with the replacement of the Royal Navy’s nuclear submarines, critical in deterring hostile states like Russia—a mission that has new-found importance given the recent deployments of British conventional forces in Eastern Europe. ...
This became clearer with Johnson’s assertion that some of the new defence funding would be used to uphold the Royal Navy’s position as ‘the foremost naval power in Europe’, mandating the construction of a new generation of frigate (the Type 32), in addition to the Type 26 and Type 31 classes already on order. ...
In short, the UK appears set to tilt further ‘east of Suez’—British strategic parlance for the Indo-Pacific—a move that has been underway for some time. Since the early 2010s, the UK has deepened its strategic relations with the Gulf states and the countries of Southeast Asia as well as Japan and Australia, while also moving to bolster its ‘strategic array’ of military facilities throughout the region, including in Bahrain and Oman.
The British naval presence in the Indo-Pacific has also become more persistent, most notably in August 2018 when the amphibious assault ship HMS Albion steamed through the Paracel archipelago en route from Tokyo to Hanoi. With this manoeuvre the Royal Navy became the only navy, other than the US Navy, to negate China’s illegitimate imposition of ‘straight baselines’ around the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea."

Britain tilts towards the Indo-Pacific | The Strategist