Living in a multipolar world with more intergovernmental organisations

While the UN, G7, G20 lose their attractiveness, influence and standing more and more other international organisations are winning with China and Russia behind it.

Take BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) and SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) for example.

How far and how fast will the post WW II global order change?

BRICS: How A 4-Letter Economic Bet Became A Global Power Platform since 2001

Recommendable!

(242) BRICS: How A 4-Letter Economic Bet Became A Global Power Platform | Firstpost America - YouTube

Is Trump Trying to Replace the UN with the new Board of Peace?

Recommendable!

US to withdraw from 66 international organizations contrary to US interests, included are 31 UN organizations

Good news! Bravo! Indeed Western countries plus Israel, India, Japan, South Korea should have their own organizations, but other countries may join.

May rogue states like Russia under Putin the Terrible, China under the rule of the Communist Party, Iran, North Korea have their own organization of rogues!

The UN was a mirage! It has failed for many decades!

"The United States will withdraw from 66 international organizations that the Trump administration deems wasteful, ineffective, or harmful, President Trump announced in a presidential memorandum on Wednesday. ..."

"Sec. 2.  Organizations from Which the United States Shall Withdraw.  (a)  Non-United Nations Organizations:

(i)       24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Compact;

(ii)      Colombo Plan Council;

(iii)     Commission for Environmental Cooperation;

(iv)      Education Cannot Wait;

(v)       European Centre of Excellence for Countering

Hybrid Threats;

(vi)      Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories;

(vii)     Freedom Online Coalition;

(viii)    Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund;

(ix)      Global Counterterrorism Forum;

(x)       Global Forum on Cyber Expertise;

(xi)      Global Forum on Migration and Development;

(xii)     Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research;

(xiii)    Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals, and Sustainable Development;

(xiv)     Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change;

(xv)      Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services;

(xvi)     International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property;

(xvii)    International Cotton Advisory Committee;

(xviii)   International Development Law Organization;

(xix)     International Energy Forum;

(xx)      International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies;

(xxi)     International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance;

(xxii)    International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law;

(xxiii)   International Lead and Zinc Study Group;

(xxiv)    International Renewable Energy Agency;

(xxv)     International Solar Alliance;

(xxvi)    International Tropical Timber Organization;

(xxvii)   International Union for Conservation of Nature;

(xxviii)  Pan American Institute of Geography and History;

(xxix)    Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation;

(xxx)     Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia;

(xxxi)    Regional Cooperation Council;

(xxxii)   Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century;

(xxxiii)  Science and Technology Center in Ukraine;

(xxxiv)   Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme; and

(xxxv)    Venice Commission of the Council of Europe.

(b)  United Nations (UN) Organizations:

(i)       Department of Economic and Social Affairs;

(ii)      UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) — Economic Commission for Africa;

(iii)     ECOSOC — Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean;

(iv)      ECOSOC — Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific;

(v)       ECOSOC — Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia;

(vi)      International Law Commission;

(vii)     International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals;

(viii)    International Trade Centre;

(ix)      Office of the Special Adviser on Africa;

(x)       Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary General for Children in Armed Conflict;

(xi)      Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict;

(xii)     Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence Against Children;

(xiii)    Peacebuilding Commission;

(xiv)     Peacebuilding Fund;

(xv)      Permanent Forum on People of African Descent;

(xvi)     UN Alliance of Civilizations;

(xvii)    UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries;

(xviii)   UN Conference on Trade and Development;

(xix)     UN Democracy Fund;

(xx)      UN Energy;

(xxi)     UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women;

(xxii)    UN Framework Convention on Climate Change;

(xxiii)   UN Human Settlements Programme;

(xxiv)    UN Institute for Training and Research;

(xxv)     UN Oceans;

(xxvi)    UN Population Fund;

(xxvii)   UN Register of Conventional Arms;

(xxviii)  UN System Chief Executives Board for Coordination;

(xxix)    UN System Staff College;

(xxx)     UN Water; and

(xxxi)    UN University.

..."

US to withdraw from 66 international organizations | The Jerusalem Post "The list included 31 UN organizations and 35 non-UN organizations, all deemed “contrary to the interests of the United States to remain a member of, participate in, or otherwise provide support to.” "

Withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that Are Contrary to the Interests of the United States

Every Global Alliance Explained

Recommendable!

Why is China's Xi Jinping Skipping the G20 Summit? with Palki Sharma

G20 Summit without Russia and China? This is then more like a G7 Summit. 😊 Except for Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, South Korea.

Brics to add Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and UAE as members

This is big news! What will the consequences be? Is this a seismic change of the international order? Quite possible!

A further loss of Western dominance in world affairs?

Brics adds 6: new ‘heavyweights’ boast oil and deep pockets, while others help ‘future-proof’ the bloc, analysts say | South China Morning Post

Is the BRICS Still Relevant? with Palki Sharma

Recommendable!

Why League of Nations Failed | The Outbreak of World War 2 with Palki Sharma

Recommendable!

America and other Western countries ought to Opt Out Of The World Health Organization’s Global Medical Tyranny

Food for thought! The obsession with globalism is detrimental! Countries are not equal!

There is little doubt that so called international organisations like the WHO supposedly representing all of humanity have been perverted or instrumentalized!

Do countries like China, Russia, or North Korea care about the WHO? No they don't unless it serves their purpose e.g. to undermine Westen countries!

I personally also have come to the conclusion that Western countries should foremost have their own organisations! Then Western countries can decide how to engage on a global scale.

"The experts could hide behind international law as they advocate economy-crushing lockdowns and forced vaccinations.

Elon Musk tweeted that “Countries should not cede authority to WHO,” and conservatives have joined him in sounding the alarm about proposed legal changes to the World Health Organization and its International Health Regulations (IHR). ...
First, proposed changes to the International Health Regulations would convert recommendations into requirements. In May of 2024, 196 U.N. member nations will vote on the changes to the IHRs, with a simple majority required to approve them. ...
Second, the new WHO pandemic treaty, also up for a vote in the U.N. in May 2024, would represent another assault on U.S. sovereignty and thus the self-governance of the American people. ..."

America Must Opt Out Of The World Health Organization’s Global Medical Tyranny

Corruption at the World Bank's Economic Opportunity Index

It is high time that Western countries finally learn the lesson! International, global, multilateral organisations are no panacea at all! This has been learnt latest since World War I!

Western countries should form their own organisations, which then cooperate with other organisations or countries on a case by case or on a concrete and verifiable agreement basis!

"From the United Nation’s Oil-for-Food Program to Interpol’s scandal-ridden contracts with Philip Morris and FIFA, international organizations have proved inept at management and undermined faith in the institutions they claim to support. The latest exhibit: the World Bank, which announced in September that it would stop publishing its Doing Business report, once an essential tool for ranking economic opportunity across the world. Internal and external audits showed that the report had become subject to political pressure, corruption, and ineptitude. ...
We now know that corruption undermined the report’s integrity. An outside audit of the 2018 and 2020 reports showed that Kristalina Georgieva, then at the Bank but now head of the International Monetary Fund, succumbed to political pressure to improve China’s rating, out of concern that a bad rating would endanger the Bank’s next round of funding from Beijing. ..."

Corruption at the World Bank's Economic Opportunity Index | City Journal As the demise of an influential World Bank ranking shows, multilateral institutions are prone to corruption.