Showing posts with label nutty scientists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nutty scientists. Show all posts

Monday, August 11, 2025

Breathing low-oxygen air slows Parkinson’s progression in mice. Really!

Maybe low oxygen has some other (negative) effects too! Is this borderline serious research or more like junk science? Are we dealing with nutty scientists?

"Low oxygen levels in the body, a condition called hypoxia, can lead to a range of effects, from mild symptoms like fatigue and confusion to severe complications such as organ damage and even death. The severity depends on the duration and degree of oxygen deprivation." (Google search result)

"Researchers from the Broad Institute and Mass General Brigham have shown that a low-oxygen environment — similar to the thin air found at Mount Everest base camp [???] — can protect the brain and restore movement in mice with Parkinson’s-like disease. ..."

From the abstract:
"Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by inclusions of α-synuclein (α-syn) and mitochondrial dysfunction in dopaminergic (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Patients with PD anecdotally experience symptom improvement at high altitude; chronic hypoxia prevents the development of Leigh-like brain disease in mice with mitochondrial complex I deficiency.
Here we report that intrastriatal injection of α-syn preformed fibrils (PFFs) in mice resulted in neurodegeneration and movement disorder, which were prevented by continuous exposure to 11% oxygen.
Specifically, PFF-induced α-syn aggregation resulted in brain tissue hyperoxia, lipid peroxidation and DA neurodegeneration in the SNpc of mice breathing 21% oxygen, but not in those breathing 11% oxygen.
This neuroprotective effect of hypoxia was also observed in Caenorhabditis elegans. Moreover, initiating hypoxia 6 weeks after PFF injection reversed motor dysfunction and halted further DA neurodegeneration. These results suggest that hypoxia may have neuroprotective effects downstream of α-syn aggregation in PD, even after symptom onset and neuropathological changes."

Breathing low-oxygen air slows Parkinson’s progression in mice | Broad Institute "Low-oxygen air prevented and even reversed symptoms in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease."



Fig. 1: Hypoxia treatment prevents α-syn aggregate-induced loss of DA neurons in the SNpc and movement disorder.



Saturday, June 28, 2025

What if universal rental assistance were implemented to deal with the housing crisis? Really!

Two nutty US professors call for socialist Big Government! They pretend and claim to bey "housing policy experts". Laughable!

What "housing crisis"? Pure propaganda and demagoguery!

If these two men were students of economics, they sure would receive a fail grade!

Why don't these two nutty professors not take a pay cut in support of needy tenants in their community instead of calling for socialist Big Government!

"Disclosure statement
Alex Schwartz has received funding from the Catherine and John D. MacArthur Foundation. Since 2019 he has served on New York City's Rent Guidelines Board. He has a relative who works for The Conversation.

Kirk McClure received funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and receives funding from the National Science Foundation."

The opening sentence is already pure demagoguery!
"If there’s one thing that U.S. politicians and activists from across the political spectrum can agree on, it’s that rents are far too high. ..."

More economic nonsense:
"... As experts on housing policy, we’re concerned about housing affordability. But our research shows little connection between a shortfall of housing and rental affordability problems. Even a massive infusion of new housing would not shrink housing costs enough to solve the crisis, as rents would likely remain out of reach for many households. ..."

"... However, there are already subsidies in place that ensure that some renters in the U.S. pay no more than 30% of their income on housing costs. The most effective [big government] solution, in our view, is to make these subsidies much more widely available. ..."

What if universal rental assistance were implemented to deal with the housing crisis?

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Bethesda Declaration — We dissent, STAND UP FOR SCIENCE. With 75% anonymous signers! Really!

When 6000 and counting obviously politicized scientists spread propaganda and demagoguery!

Of course, they don't like when ideological pet projects like DEI, LGBTQ or poor countries are cut.

Supposedly, 21 Nobel Prize winners signed too. Well, Einstein was a naive, stupid socialist! Maybe these individuals are accomplished in their fields, but politics and rational thinking in other areas???

"We dissent’: NIH staff protest Trump policies
For weeks, Science reporters have been talking to scientists at NIH about all the terrible things happening there. Yesterday many of those we’re in touch with opened up publicly with a declaration, even though it put their jobs at risk . Nearly 350 current and laid-off scientists and staff released a statement charging NIH officials and their superiors with politicizing science. The signers, about 75% anonymous ...

The Bethesda Declaration, named for NIH’s main campus in Maryland, also aims to test Bhattacharya’s avowed support for scientific dissent, organizers say. “We dissent to Administration policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe [???],” the declaration states.

More than 5000 people, including at least 21 Nobel prize winners, have signed an open letter stating that they “stand with these committed professionals in support of reversing the harmful actions of this administration. ..."



Bethesda Declaration — STAND UP FOR SCIENCE






Saturday, April 26, 2025

Nearly a third of antibiotics consumed by people end up in surface waters worldwide. Really!

I would say it has been repeatedly reported for over 50 years that antibiotics end up in rivers or lakes etc. What is the point! This seems to be a piece of junk science!

Also one of those never dying and often repeated narratives!

This study is based on computer modeling! Junk model? Garbage in, garbage out?

Lots of estimates and thresholds! How relevant are these thresholds?

What do the authors mean by "human consumption alone represents a significant risk for rivers across all continents"? So should we not consume antibiotics anymore?

It is odd that the authors did not bother to mention wastewater treatment in the abstract nor in the significance chapter. This is shoddy science!

Caveat: I did not read the study!

"Nearly a third of antibiotics consumed by people end up in rivers, per a PNAS modeling study from McGill University and One Health Trust researchers that estimates the distribution of chemical pollutants from untreated wastewater and wastewater treatment plants."

"... Much of the focus has been on the antibiotic manufacturing process, which is known to release antibiotic-laced wastewater directly into nearby waterways. That has resulted in efforts to monitor and limit pollution from antibiotic manufacturing sites.

But since antibiotics consumed by people aren't fully metabolized, wastewaters from households and hospitals are also potential sources of antibiotic contamination. And while wastewater treatment plants can remove some antibiotic residues before the treated water is released into surface waters, they can't remove all of them [???]. ...

The researchers also estimated that 750 million people—roughly 10% of the global population—are exposed [???] to the top 1% of surface waters with the highest cumulative concentrations of antibiotics. ...

The authors say the findings suggest an "urgent need" [???] for further research on the environmental fate and impact of the antibiotics that their model predicts are most prevalent in surface waters, particularly those that pose a high potential risk to aquatic ecosystems and human health. ..."

From the abstract:
"The presence of antibiotics in surface waters poses risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health due to their toxicity and influence on antimicrobial resistance. After human consumption and partial metabolism, antibiotic residues are excreted and undergo complex accumulation and decay processes along their pathway from wastewater to natural river systems.
Here, we use a global contaminant fate model to estimate that of
the annual human consumption of the 40 most used antibiotics (29,200 tonnes)
8,500 tonnes (29%) are released into the river system and 
3,300 tonnes (11%) reach the world's oceans or inland sinks.
Even when only domestic sources are considered (i.e. not including veterinary or industrial sources),
we estimate that 6 million km of rivers worldwide are subject to total antibiotic concentrations in excess of thresholds that are protective of ecosystems and resistance promotion during low streamflow conditions, 
with the dominant contributors being amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, and cefixime. Therefore, it is of concern that human consumption alone represents a significant risk for rivers across all continents, with the largest extents found in Southeast Asia. Global antibiotic consumption has grown rapidly over the last 15 years and continues to increase, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, requiring new strategies to safeguard water quality and protect human and ecosystem health."

"Significance Statement
Antibiotic contamination in global rivers poses significant threats to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Our model predicts that 8,500 tonnes of antibiotics enter river systems annually from domestic consumption alone, causing elevated concentrations of various antibiotics in rivers across all continents. For example, estimated concentrations of antibiotics in 6 million km of rivers worldwide exceed thresholds that are protective of ecosystems and/or resistance promotion, with the most impacted regions located in Southeast Asia. As global antibiotic consumption rises, especially in low- and middle-income countries, these findings underscore the urgent need for the development and implementation of strategies to minimize antibiotic pollution and safeguard environmental and human health."

Global Health NOW: Global Vaccinations in Jeopardy; Kenya’s Push to Improve HIV Testing During Pregnancy; and Run, Run, Robots!



Fig. 1 Contaminant pathways of antibiotics in the global aquatic environment. Modeled contaminant pathways and mass balances of antibiotics by path. Values in parentheses indicate total amounts of the top 40 antibiotics consumed worldwide in tonnes year−1; percentage values are relative to the total excretion amount (20,500 tonnes year−1).


Thursday, September 03, 2020

81 US science Nobel laureates back Biden in presidential race

See how stupid the so called elites are including that many Nobel laureates when it comes to politics and the economy!

I blogged here about the naive socialist Albert Einstein, one of the smartest scientists of the 20th century. His so called god letter is more proof that even the smartest scientist can be a huge fool (see my blog post here)!

"At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President."
Is that all these 81 Noble prize winners could agree on or say positively about Biden? Really? This is shockingly dismal and trivial!
The first sentence is total baloney!

US science Nobel laureates back Biden in presidential race | News | Chemistry World Eighty-one US Nobel prize winners, including 24 in chemistry, are publicly supporting Biden over Trump

Here is the endorsement letter as posted by the Nobel Laureates campaign website: