I have some serious doubts about this story! For once, is it not very convenient that this story comes out just shortly before elections?
Why not earlier! Why not e.g. one year ago?
This looks more like a dirty election campaign effort!
It also smells of Post hoc, ergo propter hoc! After a tragic event we are all smarter, right?
That the original news article is still behind a paywall is also very unfortunate, if not suspicious!
Judging from this report, the warning (if there was any) was too vague. How many warnings does a Prime Minister of Israel receive on a weekly or even daily basis?
"These were the final days of September 2023. Terrorist attacks inflamed the West Bank, masses of Gazans regularly protested at the border fence, and the country was reeling from internal conflict over the judicial coup laws. Anyone watching the events with clear eyes [???] could sense that an escalation was lurking around every corner. ..." Really!
Revealed: Netanyahu Received an Explicit Warning Days Before Oct. 7. He Didn't Brief Israel's Security Chiefs (original news article by leftist Haaretz newspaper, behind paywall) "In September '23, UAE President bin Zayed called Netanyahu to deliver a harsh warning. Netanyahu did nothing. An extensive investigation, conducted for a new book, reveals the PM's failures surrounding Oct. 7. Netanyahu: 'This is an absolute lie'"
No comments:
Post a Comment