Bad news, if confirmed!
E.g. it appears the University of Copenhagen did not release any news regarding this accusation.
"Scientist accuses Anthropic of plagiarizing team’s biology work
Anthropic said its AI agents used Claude to independently discover new enzymes it calls ARTs (array-associated reverse transcriptases) by searching gene databases.
But Copenhagen computational biologist Mario Rodríguez Mestre says he and colleagues had studied the same enzymes, which they nicknamed ‘jumbotrons,’ for four years. The team shared unpublished findings with Claude while using it for research tasks. Mestre says a key finding Anthropic credited to its AI, involving RNA molecules tied to the enzymes, matches work he says his team completed over a year earlier and had already discussed with Claude.
Anthropic responded that it found no prior published work on the ART system and that Claude was not trained on user transcripts.
The dispute echoes a similar case this month in which OpenAI claimed to have solved a math problem that mathematician Tristan Buckmaster said he had been working on using OpenAI’s models. Mestre says he is now winding down his use of Claude and moving to other AI models over concerns his research may have been used without attribution." (Data Points)
Did Anthropic’s A.I. Really Make a Scientific Discovery on Its Own? (behind paywall)
No comments:
Post a Comment