Showing posts with label microplastics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label microplastics. Show all posts

Sunday, May 24, 2026

Lab glove deposits drive false microplastic signatures in atmospheric pollution samples

Let this sink in for a moment! This story already came out in March of 2026.

Reminds e.g. of the urban heat island effect that contributed to the corruption of global warming and climate change data!

Alert: Plastophobia is a serious disorder. Please seek immediate medical help! (Caution: satire)


"Particles shed from lab gloves are being misidentified as microplastics, distorting measurements of atmospheric pollution, new research shows. ..."

"The study found that gloves may unintentionally contaminate lab equipment scientists use to measure microplastics in air, water and other samples with nonplastic particles called stearates ... researchers ... suggest cleanroom gloves, which release fewer particulates, be worn instead. ..."

From the abstract:
"To attenuate microplastics pollution, we first must quantify the number and types of microplastics found in the natural environment and identify their sources. Quantifying environmental microplastics requires distinguishing synthetic polymers from other naturally occurring species. Quality assurance and control measures – including wearing gloves when handling laboratory materials and samples – seek to reduce overestimating microplastic abundance.
However, commonly used laboratory gloves release non-volatile residues, including stearate salts, that exhibit vibrational spectra similar to microplastics. In this work, we illustrate that dry surface contact with nitrile and latex laboratory gloves can cause overestimations of microplastics (mean 2000 false positives per mm2) when using traditional library matching approaches.
We recommend a nitrile cleanroom glove (mean 100 false positives per mm2) to reduce contamination.
For existing contaminated infrared and Raman spectral datasets, we outline workflows that differentiate between microplastics and stearate contamination from gloves. Applying these workflows to a case study of glove-contaminated environmental data, we illustrate that the proposed solutions reduce MP false positives at the smallest size ranges (<10 µm).
By using this approach in conjunction with our included spectral libraries of stearate standards, researchers can address glove-based contamination in environmental datasets and provide more accurate estimates of environmental microplastic abundance."

Lab glove deposits drive false microplastic signatures in atmospheric pollution samples | Research | Chemistry World "Researchers uncover contamination pathway that’s complicating efforts to understand how much plastic is in the air"



Residue from nitrile or latex gloves may unintentionally contaminate lab equipment scientists use to measure microplastics in air, water and other samples with non-plastic particles called stearates. Stearates, a kind of salt, are chemically similar at the structural level to microplastics. They also look similar visually. 


Sunday, January 25, 2026

Atmospheric and human body microplastic pollution may have been exaggerated by several orders of magnitude

Will the truth about so called microplastics finally come out! Cui bono from all this often repeated alarmism and hysteria about plastic?

Alert: Plastophobia is a serious disorder. Please seek immediate medical help! (Caution: satire)

What about all the benefits of plastics in our lives? What are the possible substitutes (how healthy are the substitutes)?

"Not only has human microplastic exposure likely been overstated, but new research from the University of Vienna finds that previous estimates of atmospheric microplastic pollution may have been exaggerated by “several orders of magnitude.” By comparing real-world environmental samples with widely used models, the researchers found that modeled atmospheric microplastic levels were 100 to 10,000 times higher than what measurements actually showed."

"“High-profile studies reporting the presence of microplastics throughout the human body have been thrown into doubt by scientists who say the discoveries are probably the result of contamination and false positives

The Guardian [???] has identified seven studies that have been challenged by researchers publishing criticism in the respective journals, while a recent analysis listed 18 studies that it said had not considered that some human tissue can produce measurements easily confused with the signal given by common plastics. ..."

"The atmosphere is an important transport medium that carries microplastics to even the most remote parts of the world. These microplastics can be inhaled and pose a health risk to humans and animals. They can also settle out of the atmosphere and contaminate oceans and soils worldwide. A new study by the Department of Meteorology and Geophysics at the University of Vienna estimates microplastic emissions from land-based and oceanic sources into the atmosphere based on global measurement data and model simulations. The results: over 20 times more microplastic particles are emitted on land than from the ocean. The study was recently published in Nature. ...

In previous studies, the ocean was often cited as the main source. ..."

From the abstract:
"Microplastics (MPs) are global pollutants, yet their atmospheric distribution is poorly understood. Although atmospheric MP measurements have become more abundant, estimates of emissions into the atmosphere vary by orders of magnitude.
Here we compile a global atmospheric MPs dataset and compare it with size-aligned MP model simulations.
Our model simulations show two to four orders of magnitude overestimation of the measured global median atmospheric MP concentrations.
Measured median concentrations over the ocean are 27 times lower than over the land (0.003 and 0.08 particles m−3, respectively). Applying a simple scaling method, we estimate that oceanic emissions are lower in number than land-based emissions.
The total global land-based and oceanic emissions are 6.1 × 1017 (1.3 × 1017 to 1.1 × 1018) particles year−1 and 2.6 × 1016 (2.7 × 1015 to 5.0 × 1016) particles year−1, respectively.
Our results indicate that fewer MP particles are emitted into the atmosphere than previously thought. Land sources dominate the number but not the mass emissions, indicating that MPs emission size distributions should be investigated further."

Doomslayer: Progress Roundup - by Malcolm Cochran


‘A bombshell’: doubt cast on discovery of microplastics throughout human body (behind paywall) "Exclusive: Some scientists say many detections are most likely error, with one high-profile study called a ‘joke’"

Microplastics in the atmosphere: higher emissions from land areas than from the ocean (original news release) "Study reveals large discrepancies between emission estimates and measurements of microplastics in the atmosphere"



Fig. 2: Scaled bottom-up emissions and comparison with top-down and bottom-up estimates.


Monday, November 03, 2025

EU Food Authority Condemns Bad Microplastic Studies in a survey of over 1,700 publications between 2015-2025

More on the microplastic alarmism and hysteria! A neat example of junk science!

Notice many studies are based on:
  1.  "simulants"! Whatever that means or how relevant is this proxy actually!
  2. The only real food tested was "mineral water"
"... The results of the review by the European Union’s food safety experts were candidly frank and critical. Almost all studies detecting microplastic and nanoplastic exposure were deficient, unreliable and corrupted; they overstated their findings and had weak methodologies. ..."

From the abstract:
"To search for evidence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNP) release during the uses of food contact materials (FCM), a structured literature review was carried out on studies published between 2015 and 20th January 2025.
It identified 1711 publications of which 122 were selected for data extraction. Eight additional publications were added to provide more context.
Most studies concern microplastics, while data on nanoplastics are almost entirely absent. Most publications use water or aqueous food simulants as FCM contact medium for suspension and subsequent isolation of released MNP.
Foods other than mineral water were tested in only few cases. Despite the large number of publications investigating the release of MNP from FCM, the available evidence concerning the characteristics and quantities of released MNP from FCM remains limited.
Many publications are affected by methodological shortcomings in test conditions, in sample preparation, and by deficiencies in the reliability of analytical data, with the consequence of frequent misidentification and miscounting.
Based on the findings on release mechanisms, contaminations, mimicking substances, particle numbers and masses generated during the use of FCMs, it is concluded that
(i) there is evidence of microplastics released during the uses of FCM,
(ii) this release is due to mechanical stress, such as abrasion or friction, or due to materials with open or fibrous structures,
(iii) despite the uncertainties, the actual release is much lower than the results presented in many publications.
In view of all this, there is no sufficient basis at this stage to estimate MNP exposure from FCM during their uses. This review identifies methodological shortcomings and data gaps, and makes recommendations on related future research needs."

EU Food Authority Condemns Bad Microplastic Studies - Human Progress

Wednesday, October 08, 2025

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Commercial tea bags release millions of microplastics, entering human intestinal cells. Really!

Is this a serious concern or just a tempest of alarmism and hysteria in a teapot? Are you not scared to death yet?

Alert: Plastophobia is a serious disorder. Please seek immediate medical help! (Caution: satire)

What about all the benefits of plastics in our lives? What are the substitutes?


"... Food packaging is a major source of micro and nanoplastic (MNPLs) contamination and inhalation and ingestion is the main route of human exposure. ..."


From the highlights and abstract:

"Highlights • Nanoplastics were obtained from three teabag brands during a standard preparation. • ATR-FTIR shows nylon, polypropylene, and cellulose as constituents. • MNPLs release was higher for propylene and lower for nylon. • Uptake in Caco-2, HT29, and HT29-MTX human intestinal cells was determined. • Cell uptake depends on both cell type and chemical constitution of released MNPLs. Abstract The potential health implications of environmental micro/nanoplastics (MNPLs) are increasingly concerning. Beyond environmental exposure, other sources such as food packaging, including herbal/teabags, may also be significant. This study investigates the release of MNPLs from three commercially available teabags. By simulating tea preparation, MNPL samples were extracted and characterized using a range of analytical techniques: scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). The results confirmed that the teabags were made of nylon-6 (NY6), polypropylene (PP), and cellulose (CL) and that microfibers and nano-range particles (NPLs) were present in the leachates. NTA data revealed that the number of released NPLs was 1.20 × 109/mL (PP; 136.7 nm), 1.35 × 108/mL (CL; 244 nm), and 8.18 × 106/mL (NY6; 138.4). The leachate particles were then stained with iDye Poly-Pink and used to expose three human intestine-derived cell types (Caco-2, HT29, and HT29-MTX) to assess their biointeractions and the role of the mucosubstances in vitro. The results demonstrated that after 24 h of exposure to 100 μg/mL NPLs, there was significant uptake of PP-NPLs in HT29-MTX cells, as a model of cells segregating high amount of mucus. A similar uptake was observed for CL-NPLs in HT29 and HT29-MTX cells, while NY6-NPLs were internalized preferentially in Caco-2 cells. These findings underscore the importance of identifying new environmentally relevant MNPL exposure sources, for developing realistic MNPLs samples, and further investigating their potential human health effects."


Commercial tea bags release millions of microplastics, entering human intestinal cells


Graphical abstract


Thursday, August 08, 2024

Microplastics are everywhere and in our body, but are they harming us? Really!

Good question! What about nanoplastics or forever plastics?

If plastic was so dangerous as the daily alarmism and hysteria wants us to believe, we would be all long dead!

What about all the benefits of plastics in our lives? What are the substitutes?

Alert: Plastophobia is a serious disorder. Please seek immediate medical help! (Caution: satire)


"... Evidence suggests they might, but it’s limited in scope. Some researchers are worried, but acknowledge there are lots of unanswered questions. ..."

Global Health NOW: A Scourge of Counterfeit Medicines; A 40-Year Quest to a Malaria Vaccine; and Nigeria’s New Era of Genetic Research

Friday, May 10, 2024

Microrobots capture bacteria and microplastics out of the water

Amazing stuff! Good news! These microrobots are reusable!

Plastophobia is a serious disease! Please seek medical help immediately!

"Scientists have developed tiny "robots" which appear to be very effective at removing microplastics pollution from water. What's more, the little bots also target the harmful bacteria that often hitch a ride on the plastic particles. ..."

From the abstract:
"The forefront of micro- and nanorobot research involves the development of smart swimming micromachines emulating the complexity of natural systems, such as the swarming and collective behaviors typically observed in animals and microorganisms, for efficient task execution. This study introduces magnetically controlled microrobots that possess polymeric sequestrant “hands” decorating a magnetic core. Under the influence of external magnetic fields, the functionalized magnetic beads dynamically self-assemble from individual microparticles into well-defined rotating planes of diverse dimensions, allowing modulation of their propulsion speed, and exhibiting a collective motion. These mobile microrobotic swarms can actively capture free-swimming bacteria and dispersed microplastics “on-the-fly”, thereby cleaning aquatic environments. Unlike conventional methods, these microrobots can be collected from the complex media and can release the captured contaminants in a second vessel in a controllable manner, that is, using ultrasound, offering a sustainable solution for repeated use in decontamination processes. Additionally, the residual water is subjected to UV irradiation to eliminate any remaining bacteria, providing a comprehensive cleaning solution. In summary, this study shows a swarming microrobot design for water decontamination processes."

Tiny tenacious robots snatch bacteria and microplastics out of the water


Graphical abstract


Friday, November 17, 2023

Sex toys exposed as an overlooked source of microplastics, study finds

The guilt of sex is back! You are toying with what! Microplastics!

Scientists like sex toys too, but they need an excuse to play with it! 😊 

The scientists used an abrasion machine to play with the sex toys, which seems quite artificial and may not reflect actual human use very well. This study may even qualify as junk science.

The fabricated and exaggerated microplastics scare is now invading your bedroom! Microplastics, a mania of our days!

What a hysteria and alarmism! Do you believe that the Medieval Ages and superstition ended with the Age of Enlightenment? Think again!

Plastophobia is a serious disease! Please see a doctor immediately!

Humans have been living with all kinds of dust for tens thousands of years! If humans were so sensitive, we would be long extinct.

From the abstract:
"A majority of American adults report having used sex toys, which, by design, interact with intimate and permeable body parts yet have not been subject to sufficient risk assessment or management. Physical and chemical data are presented examining potential risks associated with four types of currently available sex toys: anal toy, beads, dual vibrator, and external vibrator. A standardized abrasion machine made real-time breakdown of products into microplastics and nanoplastics. The microplastics from the sex toys were then solvent extracted and analyzed using GC–MS. Rates of microplastics and nanoplastics released during abrasion testing from most microplastic release to least was the anal toy, beads, dual vibrator, external vibrator. Both micro- and nanoplastics particles were generated following the abrasion test, with the 50 percentile diameters (D50) ranging from the anal beads at 658.5 μm, dual vibrator at 887.83 μm, anal toy at 950 μm, and external vibrator at 1673.33 μm. ... This data set is not intended to be representative of sex toys as an entire class of products, nor are the abrasion experiments claiming to simulate exact use conditions. However, these exploratory data frame potential concerns, highlighting research questions and the need for prompt prioritization of protective action. Therefore, future studies and multi-stakeholder action are needed to understand and reduce risk for this class of products."

Sex toys exposed as an overlooked source of microplastics, study finds

Bringing sex toys out of the dark: exploring unmitigated risks

Scary stuff! Sex toy microplastic microscope images from A Anal Toy B Beads C External Vibrator and D Dual Vibrator


Friday, November 04, 2022

Ecological and human health risks of atmospheric microplastics. Really!

Microsplastics are discovered everywhere so it seems! Alarmism and hysteria is big business! Exploiting human fears like this is intentional manipulation! A case of pseudoscience!

Where are all these newly discovered atmospheric microplastics coming from? Are they really new? Very doubtful! I would guess, we have lived with so called microplastics for years if not decades, but now they are discovered for propaganda and demagoguery! Microplastics are en vogue!

What if these microplastics are fairly harmless and are detected only in low concentration? 

Yesterday, I blogged here about a dubious story that claimed blue whales are estimated to eat 10 million microplastics particles per day!

Shame on the scientists who participate in this alarmism and hysteria with pseudoscience!

Plastophobia is a serious disorder, please consult with a doctor ASAP!

"...  inhalation may induce health risks ..."

Ecological and human health risks of atmospheric microplastics (MPs): a review - Environmental Science: Atmospheres (RSC Publishing)

Thursday, November 03, 2022

Study finds blue whales eat some 10 million microplastic particles a day. Really!

Probably pseudoscience combined with alarmism and hysteria provided through courtesy of Stanford University!

As the title of the paper clearly says its "exposure risk" not actual consumption!!!

Again who publishes this shoddy science? Nature journal!

That krill eats the microplastics first is already a very strong assumption!

The researchers associate the concentration of microplastics in subsurface ocean water with logs of whale movements. This is highly indirect! No direct evidence is provided!

This research does not mention any evidence of the negativ impact of eating microplastics. It is simply presumed or insinuated!

So we know that animals are eating plastics for 50 years now. So how bad is it actually?

Shame on the scientists who participate in this alarmism and hysteria with pseudoscience!

Plastophobia is a serious disorder, please consult with a doctor ASAP!

"... Published in Nature Communications, the study focuses on blue, fin, and humpback whales and their consumption of plastic fragments no bigger than a few grains of sand, which are commonly called microplastics. The authors combined measures of microplastic concentrations up and down the water column off the coast of California with detailed logs of where hundreds of whales carrying tracking devices foraged for food between 2010 and 2019.
They found the whales predominantly feed 50 to 250 meters below the surface, a depth that coincides with the highest concentrations of microplastic in the open ocean. The planet’s biggest creature – the blue whale – ingests the most plastic, at an estimated 10 million pieces per day as it feeds almost exclusively on shrimplike animals called krill. ...
There’s only one link: The krill eat the plastic, and then the whale eats the krill,” ...
Humpback whales subsisting primarily on fish such as herring and anchovies ingest an estimated 200,000 pieces of microplastic per day, while those eating mostly krill ingest at least 1 million pieces. Fin whales, which feed on both krill and fish, ingest an estimated 3 million to 10 million microplastic pieces per day. ...
This is the first time the group’s rare trove of detailed information about whales’ lives and biology has been connected to plastic pollution, a rapidly proliferating problem that adds to threats from noise, chemical, and biological pollution. “For species struggling to recover from historical whaling alongside other anthropogenic pressures, our findings suggest that the cumulative impacts of multiple stressors require further attention,” the authors write.

Whales are hardly alone in their consumption of plastic, which was first reported in marine food webs 50 years ago and has now been found in at least 1,000 species. ..."

From the abstract:
"Microparticles, such as microplastics and microfibers, are ubiquitous in marine food webs [???]. Filter-feeding megafauna may be at extreme risk of exposure to microplastics, but neither the amount nor pathway of microplastic ingestion are well understood. Here, we combine depth-integrated microplastic data from the California Current Ecosystem with high-resolution foraging measurements from 191 tag deployments on blue, fin, and humpback whales to quantify plastic ingestion rates and routes of exposure. We find that baleen whales predominantly feed at depths of 50–250 m, coinciding with the highest measured microplastic concentrations in the pelagic ecosystem. Nearly all (99%) microplastic ingestion is predicted to occur via trophic transfer. We predict that fish-feeding whales are less exposed to microplastic ingestion than krill-feeding whales. Per day, a krill-obligate blue whale may ingest 10 million pieces of microplastic, while a fish-feeding humpback whale likely ingests 200,000 pieces of microplastic. For species struggling to recover from historical whaling alongside other anthropogenic pressures, our findings suggest that the cumulative impacts of multiple stressors require further attention."

Study finds blue whales eat some 10 million microplastic particles a day

How much microplastic do whales eat? Up to 10 million pieces per day, Stanford research finds Analysis of ocean plastic pollution and whale foraging behavior tracked with noninvasive tags shows whales are ingesting tiny specks of plastic in far bigger quantities than previously thought, and nearly all of it comes from the animals they eat – not the water they gulp.


Fig. 1: Depth of rorqual whale foraging in relation to microplastic in the water column