Friday, September 16, 2022

Nature journal: Inside the US Supreme Court’s war on science. Really!

Nature journal just published a propaganda piece on the U.S. Supreme Court! 

When the justices are liberal and left leaning than it is OK with Nature journal!

What a piece of junk!

Curiously, the author of this piece cites a 2007 SCOTUS decision, which declared CO2 to be a pollutant under the Clean Air Act based on scientific evidence! Since when is CO2 a pollutant? Plants like trees need to breathe it. It is largely neutral and harmless to health etc..  Plus such expansive interpretation of existing federal law is dubious by the SCOTUS!

"In late June, the US Supreme Court issued a trio of landmark decisions that repealed the right to abortion, loosened gun restrictions and curtailed climate regulations.  ...
The Supreme Court has been tilting to the right ideologically for more than a decade, but its political centre of gravity shifted drastically after former president Donald Trump secured three appointments, culminating with Amy Coney Barrett to replace the late liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020. The result, scholars say, is an ultraconservative, six-member supermajority that is often sceptical of — if not outright hostile towards — science. ...
Scientific evidence has played into some high-profile issues put before the court. In 2007, for instance, the Supreme Court set the stage for modern climate regulations when it ruled that carbon dioxide, and by extension other greenhouse gases, qualify as pollutants under the Clean Air Act. ..."

Inside the US Supreme Court’s war on science A new ultraconservative supermajority on the United States’ top court is undermining science’s role in informing public policy. Scholars fear the results could be disastrous for public health, justice and democracy itself.

No comments: