Saturday, April 25, 2015

Earth Day On Lenin's Birthday

Posted: 4/25/2015

Trigger

Just read “Is Earth Day on Lenin's Birthday a Coincidence?”. This is an excellent article and should be recommended reading for high school students.

This article explains why it is most likely no coincidence that the first Earth Day was celebrated 45 years ago exactly on Vladimir Lenin’s 100th birthday (4/22/1870). I fully agree.

Salient Excerpts

I have added emphasis.

  1. “... given that most of the modern environmentalist movement grew out of the far left student movement of the 1960s. In that milieu, it wasn’t rare to see people brandishing and citing Chairman Mao’s Little Red Book as a source of wisdom. And many in the anti-war movement accused the capitalist chemical companies of growing rich by producing napalm and Agent Orange to drop on the people and forests of Viet Nam.”
    [Yes, I witnessed this too!]
  2. Most environmental economists of the time believed that only socialist countries would ably protect the environment, because the governments there were acting for the good of all mankind, while capitalists in the West cared only about profit maximization and not a whit about the environment. Thus it was no surprise that the conventional wisdom would turn a generation of young people towards socialism as the only way to protect the Earth.”
  3. [I fully agree. This still holds true today. Many, often prominent and influential, economists are closet socialists.]
  4. “Lenin and the early communists did believe that environmental degradation would disappear under communism. And in fact, pollution and environmental degradation were “outlawed” in the constitutions of most communist countries. Thus it was little surprise that the youth of the nascent environmental movement would view Lenin and socialism as the path to preserving the planet.
  5. But throughout the 1970s and 1980s, as more and more cracks opened in the Iron Curtain, economists and journalists were able to visit the communist countries and reported discovering a degree of environmental degradation far beyond that present in the West—from the gold dome of Sigismund Chapel of Wawel Cathedral in Cracow dissolving from acid rain to the drying up of the Aral Sea. Yet, the socialist environmental paradigm endured.”
    [I fully agree. The author even understates how the socialists poisoned their own population and he does not mention Chernobyl.]
  6. So on the 45th anniversary of the first Earth Day, we sadly see the continuing belief in command-and-control economic systems. Government ownership of the land, water, and natural resources continues to grow with each passing year. The mass of governmental regulatory agencies, bureaucrats, and the sheer staggering number of new environmental regulations passed every year take us further away from any solution.”
    [Yes, we continue on the Road to Serfdom. Earth Day is only a pretext for bigger government.]
  7. “Over time the theory of free market environmentalism and private conservation has been developed and continued to grow, demonstrating that the root cause of environmental degradation had been the absence of clearly defined and enforceable property rights in land, water, air, natural resources, and wildlife, and that the expansion of the use of the institutions of a free society—property rights, markets, and prices—would have largely prevented or greatly reduced the levels of environmental degradation.”
  8. “Had the first Earth Day been celebrated on Adam Smith's birthday, June 16, instead of Vladimir Lenin’s, the Earth would be a freer, more prosperous and greener place. ...”
    [This is a great ending of this article!]

I may add, I believe, the story has not yet been really told how much the KGB or other communist intelligence services were behind the environmentalism movements in the West.

Friday, April 24, 2015

Winston Churchill On Socialism

Posted: 4/24/2015

I am aware of following two great quotes from brilliant Winston Churchill on socialism (source, see e.g. here):
  1. “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”
    (Speech in the House of Commons, October 22, 1945)
  2. “Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy.”
    (Speech, May 28, 1948 at the Scottish Unionist Conference, Perth, Scotland)

Will the next Winston Churchill stand up and help to stop the still ongoing march towards socialism dominant and prevalent in most Western countries!

Thursday, April 23, 2015

My Lai Massacre Revisited

Posted: 4/23/2015

Trigger

Just watched “AMERICAN EXPERIENCE/ My Lai” for the first time. Here is the Wikipedia entry for this 1.5 hour long documentary.

Remarks

  1. To suspect that My Lai village was a stronghold of Vietcong at the time was apparently  an U.S. intelligence disaster. Further, on that day there was apparently no or little counterfire.
  2. This is surely a dark chapter of U.S. military history. Nothing was done to stop the ongoing massacre although reports of it came in early over radio. The attempted cover up in the aftermath by higher ups was and remains despicable.
  3. Thank God, several courageous U.S. soldiers tried to halt the massacre or to save innocent, unarmed Vietnamese such as Hugh Clowers Thompson, Jr and his helicopter crew (Glenn Andreotta and Lawrence Colburn). Finally, in 1998 at least several of them received a Soldier’s Medal (u.S. Army's highest award for bravery not involving direct contact with the enemy) for their heroic efforts.
  4. Twenty-six officers and enlisted soldiers, including William Calley and Ernest Medina, were charged with criminal offenses, but all were either acquitted or pardoned.
  5. The documentary shows the bizarre reaction (the “Free Calley” movement) of the public in response to the prosecution of William Calley. “Nixon got 260,000 letters and 75,000 telegrams, most opposing the verdict.”
    “Many in America were outraged by Calley's sentence. Georgia's governor, Jimmy Carter, instituted American Fighting Man's Day and asked Georgians to drive for a week with their lights on. The Arkansas, Kansas, Texas, New Jersey, and South Carolina legislatures requested clemency for Calley.[12] Alabama's governor, George Wallace, visited Calley in the stockade and requested that President Nixon pardon him.” (source)
  6. It still remains an incomprehensible disgrace that none of the U.S. military war criminals was ever sentenced except for one.
  7. Why U.S. President Richard M. Nixon basically pardoned the only convicted war criminal, i.e. William Calley should be seen as another, awful disgrace! “Under mounting pressure from the public, President Richard Nixon intervened on April 1, 1971, and ordered Lieutenant Calley released from the army stockade and placed under house arrest. Calley's sentence was reduced the following August, and reduced again in April of 1974 when he returned to the stockade. When he was released on parole on November 9, 1974, ...” (source, source2)

A Hero In Action

True heroes are rare!

Following is an excerpt taken from the Wikipedia entry on Lawrence Coburn (emphasis added):
“Movement from the ditch indicated to Thompson that there were still people alive in there. Thompson landed his helicopter and dismounted. David Mitchell a sergeant and squad leader in 1st Platoon, C Company, walked over to him. When asked by Thompson whether any help could be provided to the people in the ditch, the sergeant replied that the only way to help them was to put them out of their misery. Second Lieutenant William Calley (1st Platoon Leader, C Company) then came up, and the two had the following conversation:[3]
Thompson: What's going on here, Lieutenant?
Calley: This is my business.
Thompson: What is this? Who are these people?
Calley: Just following orders.
Thompson: Orders? Whose orders?
Calley: Just following...
Thompson: But, these are human beings, unarmed civilians, sir.
Calley: Look Thompson, this is my show. I'm in charge here. It ain't your concern.
Thompson: Yeah, great job.
Calley: You better get back in that chopper and mind your own business.
Thompson: You ain't heard the last of this!
Thompson took off again, and Andreotta reported that Mitchell was now executing the people in the ditch. Furious, Thompson flew over the northeast corner of the village and spotted a group of about ten civilians, including children, running toward a homemade bomb shelter. Pursuing them were soldiers from the 2nd Platoon, C Company. Realizing that the soldiers intended to murder the Vietnamese, Thompson landed his aircraft between them and the villagers. Thompson turned to Colburn and Andreotta and told them that if the Americans began shooting at the villagers or him, they should fire their M60 machine guns at the Americans: "Y'all cover me! If these bastards open up on me or these people, you open up on them. Promise me!":[4] Colburn (whose M60 faced 2nd Platoon) replied, "You got it boss, consider it done." He turned his weapon to face the American soldiers and exchanged stares with them, but privately was uncertain if he could actually fire on his fellow countrymen. Thompson then dismounted to confront the 2nd Platoon's leader, Stephen Brooks. Thompson told him he wanted help getting the peasants out of the bunker:[5]
Thompson: Hey listen, hold your fire. I'm going to try to get these people out of this bunker. Just hold your men here.
Brooks: Yeah, we can help you get 'em out of that bunker – with a hand grenade!
Thompson: Just hold your men here. I think I can do better than that.

“Thompson made an official report of the killings and was interviewed by Colonel Oran Henderson, the commander of the 11th Infantry Brigade (the parent organization of the 20th Infantry). Concerned, senior American Division officers cancelled similar planned operations by Task Force Barker against other villages (My Lai 5, My Lai 1, etc.) in Quang Ngai Province, possibly preventing the additional massacre of further hundreds, if not thousands, of Vietnamese civilians.” (source)

“Thompson was condemned and ostracized by many individuals in the United States military and government, as well as the public, for his role in the investigations and trials concerning the Mỹ Lai Massacre. As a direct result of what he experienced, Thompson suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder, alcoholism, divorce, and severe nightmare disorder. Despite the adversity he faced, he remained in the United States Army until November 1st, 1983” (source)

Were There Other Massacres?

Probably yes, but probably only a few massacres occurred between the beginning of heavy U.S. military involvement in 1960 to the end in 1975. When you Google for massacres in vietnam war you come up with one other massacre described e.g. here.

Thus, the U.S. military with respect to massacres is probably more maligned in the global public opinion than is justified.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

How The U.S. Supreme Court Butchered The Constitution

Posted: 4/21/2015

Trigger

Just read “15 Supreme Court Decisions that Shredded the Constitution When the Court traded law and liberty for political expediency”. This is a very recommendable article! Something like it has been on my mind for a long time. It should be recommended study for every high school student!

Unfortunately, the descriptions of each of the selected cases is very short and not easy to follow for a lay person in legal matters.

I do not have the time at the moment to do more research or provide more comments, but I have held for some time that the U.S. Supreme Court is the mightiest abettor and accomplice of big government.

Some Preliminary Remarks

The author excluded older, superseded decisions like the “infamous horrific” Plessy v. Ferguson or Dred Scott, because according to the author’s judgment these do not represent “guiding precedent” anymore. I would strongly argue that this awfully wrong. These cases were trailblazers for what the U.S. Supreme Court could get away with without an outcry from the citizens of the U.S. These superseded cases still matter a lot.

Of course, the author omitted landmark cases, e..g. West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937) which is said to have ended the Lochner era (based on Lochner v. New York (1905)).

I disagree that the author ranked Kelo v. City of New London (2005) only as 13th. Given it’s far reaching implications, the author underestimated the significance of this decision perhaps because it is so new. However, Kelo is another very grave violation of private property rights of the citizens of the U.S.

The Fetish Of Higher Education

Posted: 4/21/2015

Since we are living in an era where enormous challenges to traditional academic education is under way from the Internet it is opportune to delve into this subject of our current obsession with secondary education. E.g. most politicians try to sell college education as a must.

What about the many dropouts who have lived a distinguished career and whose intellect is surely comparable to the one of any graduate?

What about the many extraordinary achievers who never had a or had only little formal education? E.g. Michael Faraday? Those self-educated geniuses!

Monday, April 20, 2015

Revealing Interview With Martin O' Malley

Posted: 4/20/2015

Trigger

This morning on my commute I was listening to an NPR interview with presumptive Democratic presidential candidate and former Governor of Maryland, former mayor of Baltimore Martin O’Malley.

During this interview he tried to position himself as another, lefty champion of the middle class.

Unimpressive Political Career

We lived in the Washington, DC area while he was the mayor of Baltimore and while he was governor of Maryland. If I am not mistaken, then his political career was not distinguished or what did he accomplish?

He was succeeded by a Republican governor.

Revealing His Total Economic Illiteracy

NPR asked O’Malley: “... Marco Rubio ... He argues that an active government actually keeps people frozen at their economic status because if you are well off, if you can afford a lawyer, if you can deal with regulations, you can maneuver through government and stay prosperous. And if you are not so well off, it's harder to work the system. Is there some truth to that? ...”

O’Malley responded: “No, I don't think there's any truth to that.”

To my surprise the NPR interviewer followed up immediately with two questions. I rarely give credit to NPR, because of their notorious big government or lefty bias, but during this interview … (Or was it done to bolster Clinton?).

NPR asked: Not any truth to that?

O’Malley insisted: No, I don't think there's any truth to that. [O’Malley is now on the record!]

NPR did not give up: “Isn't it true that corporations, large corporations for example, are able to deal with regulations in a way that small businesses might struggle with?”

O'Malley became evasive and diverted: “Oh, certainly. I mean, our tax code's been turned into Swiss cheese. And certainly the concentrated wealth and accumulated power and the systematic deregulation of Wall Street has led to this situation where the economy isn't working for most of us. All of that is true. But it is not true that regulation holds poor people down or regulation keeps middle class from advancing. That's kind of patently bulls- - -.”


Red Herring Candidacy

If he is indeed not very qualified to compete, then his candidacy presumably serves primarily to fool voters into believing that Ms. Clinton is somewhat a centrist.

Missing Oil From The BP Oil Spill Baloney

Posted: 4/20/15

Trigger


In recent times I have seen other, similar articles. Do those articles just coincide with the 5th anniversary and somebody had to cook up something to remind people how bad oil exploration and production is?

On the other hand, the Smithsonian Magazine had one of the best articles so far on the occasion of the 5th anniversary of this accident here titled “Five Things The Gulf Oil Spill Has Taught Us About the Ocean
While researching the spill, scientists tracked deep-sea sharks, found new mud dragons, and discovered a type of ocean current”. Some of this research was paid for by BP in the aftermath of the spill.

The Facts Please


Nobody knows exactly how many millions of gallons of crude oil spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. Thus, to pretend that there was a significant quantity of oil unaccounted for is highly disingenuous.

The world did not come to a crushing end because of this spill. There was no lasting or permanent damage to flora or fauna or humans. Too bad, but environmentalists try again and again to proselytize the rest of us otherwise with baloney and phony information.

A Bit Of Offshore Oil Rig Statistics

IHS Petrodata publishes weekly counts of offshore oil rig data here.

There are currently 860 offshore oil rigs in operation as I presume. This count was probably not much lower 5 years ago. Thus, how often do major oil spills related to offshore oil rigs occur? This are apparently rare, isolated events.

Doggie Love Adiction

Posted: 4/20/15

Trigger


We learn from the above article (emphasis added):
  1. “Increases in β-endorphin (beta-endorphin), oxytocin and dopamine—neurochemicals associated with positive feelings and bonding—have been observed in both dogs and people after enjoyable interactions like petting, play and talking. Essentially, interacting with a dog, particularly a known dog, can have some of the same psychophysiological markers as when two emotionally attached people spend time together.”
  2. “The new study, by Miho Nagasawa of Azabu University in Japan and colleagues, builds on Nagasawa’s previous work, published in Hormones and Behavior in 2009, that found owners and dogs sharing a long mutual gaze had higher levels of oxytocin in their urine than owners of dogs giving a shorter gaze.”

Pets By The Numbers

According to the Humane Society:
  • Pet ownership in the U.S. has more than tripled from the 1970s, when approximately 67 million households had pets, to 2012, when there were 164 million [households] owned pets.
    In other words, in 2012, 62 percent of American households included at least one pet.”
  • “83.3 million—Number of owned dogs
  • 47 percent—Percentage of households that own at least one dog”

What is behind this tremendous increase in pet ownership not only in the U.S., but also in other Western countries like Germany?

Is it misanthropy; longing for more loving relationships; are human relationships not fulfilling; a (nostalgic) return to nature; or drug addiction or some combination?