Yesterday's Nature journal fully exposed their gender identity propaganda and demagoguery! It also exposes the twisted minds of the editors of this daily briefing.
For Nature journal women are (vulnerable and marginalized) scientists, but women can not have breast cancer. How about that!
Their daily Nature Briefing of 6/23/2022 contains following two items among others:
- "Cancer cells wake up when people sleep"
- "Women’s contributions often overlooked"
The first item is actually about breast cancer, which only women not people are affected by. To quote:
"Researchers have discovered that breast cancer cells are more likely to jump into the blood when people are resting. The revelation is relevant because cancer is at its deadliest when a tumour’s cells worm their way into the bloodstream and travel to a new location in the body to set up shop — a process called metastasis. It doesn’t mean that people with breast cancer should avoid sleep"
The second item is about a pseudoscience study that women (female scientists) not people are discriminated against and disadvantaged compared to their male colleagues. I blogged here about this piece of pseudoscience. To quote:
"Women are less likely to be credited with authorship on scientific papers or patents than their male peers, despite doing the same amount of work. An innovative analysis of how research contributions are recognized has revealed what many female scientists have long suspected, but researchers have struggled to demonstrate because measuring missed opportunities is challenging. A team studied the outputs of almost 10,000 research groups in the United States and found that women were around half as likely to be named an author on a scientific document as men. The authors of the analysis say this is because women’s contributions to research are “often not known, not appreciated or ignored”. The results also partly explain the well-documented trend of women publishing less than men."
"Women are less likely to be credited with authorship on scientific papers or patents than their male peers, despite doing the same amount of work. An innovative analysis of how research contributions are recognized has revealed what many female scientists have long suspected, but researchers have struggled to demonstrate because measuring missed opportunities is challenging. A team studied the outputs of almost 10,000 research groups in the United States and found that women were around half as likely to be named an author on a scientific document as men. The authors of the analysis say this is because women’s contributions to research are “often not known, not appreciated or ignored”. The results also partly explain the well-documented trend of women publishing less than men."
No comments:
Post a Comment