Good news! I will add it to my Christmas wish list! 😊
A solution for the chronic shortage of expert reviewers?
"... There are only so many experts available to properly evaluate a study and provide meaningful feedback, while others may have conflicts of interest or biases. ...
To build a powerful AI reviewer that provides users with constructive feedback. Together, he and a team of scientists from various backgrounds including AI, engineering, and biology created q.e.d. Its name is derived from quod erat demonstrandum, a Latin phrase meaning “which was to be demonstrated,” which is typically signed at the end of mathematical proofs and philosophical arguments. Though not a peer, q.e.d is an online tool that aims to help scientists improve their research before submission.
With q.e.d, users simply upload their manuscript or even an early draft to q.e.d’s website. Within 30 minutes, they receive a report that breaks the research down into ... a “claim tree.” The AI identifies the claims made within the work, examines the logical connections between them, pinpoints strengths and weaknesses, and suggests both experimental and textual edits. ...
With q.e.d, users simply upload their manuscript or even an early draft to q.e.d’s website. Within 30 minutes, they receive a report that breaks the research down into ... a “claim tree.” The AI identifies the claims made within the work, examines the logical connections between them, pinpoints strengths and weaknesses, and suggests both experimental and textual edits. ...
Since its launch in October 2025, researchers from more than 1,000 institutions worldwide have tried q.e.d, and it has garnered much buzz amongst the scientific community. ...
Refine, another AI peer-review agent. ..."
q.e.d. website "Used by scientists at 1,000+ institutions to evaluate the science they read and write."
The following map displays the number of institutions in each country where researchers use qed
No comments:
Post a Comment