Is it not very convenient that the net zero zealots do not to require net zero for the massive amounts of soft drinks we consume on a daily basis?
If these alarmists are so concerned about CO2 emissions why are they ignoring carbonated soft drinks? This is a very peculiar and revealing omission!
How come? The article from BBC Science Focus below tries to downplay the impact as too minor in a ridiculous and quite misleading way! I have not yet done my own calculations, but I have a strong hunch that the CO2 released by the production and/or consumption of soft drinks worldwide is not negligible as they want us to believe.
Would it not be very easy and quick to prohibit the production of carbonated soft drinks? You would not even have to wait for several years like with the forced phasing out of the production of gasoline internal combustion engine cars and trucks?
Is the business lobby for soft drinks so strong or is it that an immediate prohibition of soft drinks would not be taken lightly by the population? Perhaps, more members of the population would start thinking harder about the Global Warming hoax and Climate Change religion.
"A typical carbonated soft drink contains approximately 3–4 volumes (6–8 g/L) CO2." (Source) "The global carbonated soft drinks market had total revenues of $301,361.7m in 2018 ... a total of 195,579.4 million liters in 2018." (Source)
No comments:
Post a Comment