Trigger
Just read in the Wall Street Journal a book review titled “Book Review: 'Inventing Freedom' by Daniel Hannan/The U.S. and Britain together midwifed political freedom into the modern world.” (Subscription only)
Selective Takeaway From The Review
Emphasis added to quotes.
- “Long before the 16th century, English law had considered boys free agents the moment they reached legal maturity. Once he left home, a young Englishman could join whatever trade he wished.”
[Wow, if this is correct! I do not know exactly what the situation in other parts of the world was at that time, but I guess this kind of freedom was not prevalent.] - “English law, too, allowed a man to leave his property to whomever he pleased, whereas Continental [Europe] laws required a more equitable distribution to all family members - a difference that still exists.”
[If true, that is also quite amazing.] - “Long before the rise of industrialism in the 18th century, then, English society reflected a view of individual rights and economic mobility that was largely absent on the Continent.”
[That is the summary of the afore quoted.] - “... England’s 1689 Bill of Rights maintained that “excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
[Either I forgot already or in my ignorance I was not even aware of a British Bill of Rights that preceded the U.S. Bill of Rights by a good 100 years nor that it contains language so familiar from the U.S. Constitution. In particular, the common law Right To Keep And Bear Arms.]
No comments:
Post a Comment