Posted: 12/6/2015 Updated: 7/22/2019
Update Of 7/22/2019
Here is a recent article by the ASPI about this subject again. It is a review of the new book titled “How to defend Australia” written by Howard White.
“But in between those paragraphs White explores the history of Australian interest in a national nuclear weapons program, underlines the dwindling credibility of US nuclear assurances to allies, canvasses a possible nuclear doctrine for Australia, and recommends a force structure—more submarines—suitable to what he sees as our new straitened strategic circumstances. If he’s not advocating a nuclear arsenal, why is he telling us so much about what it ought to look like?” (book review; Emphasis added)
Original Post
It appears there is exactly such a discussion going on in Australia about this subject according to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI). I did not have the time to follow this discussion or the history of nuclear armament in Australia, but this could be serious.
Is this happening in response to the retreat and increasing, perceived unreliability of the U.S. to provide protection in the region or that the U.S., Germany, France, U.K. allowed Iran to get away with their nuclear weapons program so easily without substantial demands?
No comments:
Post a Comment