NASA Is A Major Perpetrator And Purveyor Of The Global Warming Hoax

Posted: 2/8/2019  Updated: 2/9/2019

Update Of 2/9/2019

Have you ever tried to raise a concern with the leadership of NASA as a citizen? Well, you can’t! The contact form of NASA is useless (Source 5; you can ask NASA about how to become an astronaut). The fairly new administrator of NASA, i.e. Jim Bridenstine, does not publish his e-mail address (Source 4). However, Mr. Bridenstine publishes his Twitter account (Source 3, 4). I would have contacted him by email to tell him to stop this hoax at NASA!

Another purveyor and perpetrator of the Global Warming hoax is Berkeley Earth (Source 6) for similar reasons as NASA. Just to give you a taste of their distortions: “Climate Fast Facts

"urban heat island" effect is real, but it has not had a significant impact on global temperatures since 1950.” (emphasis added) The urban heat island is much more than real it has a huge impact on surface temperature measurement (see my blog post here).

Original Post

Like an annual, quasi religious ritual, NASA again announced that 2018 was the hottest year on record, the fourth hottest year in a row. In 2018, the global annual average temperature rose by 0.8 degrees Celsius.

This is utter, pure, and contemptible demagoguery by NASA:

1. A 0.8 degree increase is well within the margin of error or uncertainty given that this is a global average. NASA does not even bother to publish the margin of error (Source 1)
2. NASA only uses “surface temperature”. This is a serious and devastating sampling bias. It is well known that for example air or high altitude temperatures do not confirm this hottest year nonsense
3. We also know that surface temperature measuring stations were systematically and deliberately eliminated, if they reported too cool temperatures (e.g. Climate Gate)
4. We do not learn how NASA accounts for the pervasive heat island effect (see my blog post here)
5. NASA employs a seriously flawed methodology: “global surface temperature relative to 1951-1980 average temperatures”. Why would NASA pick such a short reference period? Don’t we have data that goes back to about 1880? Was there not a Global Cooling scare  in the 1970s before the Global Warming scare became en vogue? “By the 1970s, scientists were becoming increasingly aware that estimates of global temperatures showed cooling since 1945” (Source 2) Does this not suggest that NASA deliberately chose 1951-1980 because it contains a period of global cooling?
6. I am sure more could be listed here ...

Sadly, it appears that NASA is complicit in the deception of the general public by massaging and torturing data to produce the Global Warming hoax!

It is high time for President Trump to stop this nonsense and drain the swamp!

Sources:

1. https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
3. https://twitter.com/JimBridenstine
4. https://www.nasa.gov/content/nasa-administrator-bridenstine
5. https://www.nasa.gov/content/submit-a-question-for-nasa
6. http://berkeleyearth.org/summary-of-findings/