A Brief Exposition Of The Taylor Rule
According to a 1993 paper
by John B. Taylor, the Taylor Rule is defined as follows:
r is the federal funds rate
p is the rate of inflation over the previous four
quarters
y is the percent deviation of real GDP from a target
(trend real GDP)
2 is an assumed target rate of inflation
This rule is dominated by ambiguous
concepts, i.e. target inflation rate and trend or potential growth of GDP, and
by its focus on inflation. Another objective of this rule appears to be to
smooth the business cycle and to make the business cycle more predictable. It
is aimed at reducing discretionary monetary policies.
Professor Taylor also
concludes his article in diminishing the value of his own rule by saying “This
paper has endeavored to study the role of policy rules in a world where simple,
algebraic formulations of such rules cannot
and should not be mechanically followed by policymakers.” (Emphasis added)
So what is it then a rule or a rubber band at the discretion of Fed chairmen like
the irresponsible Ben Bernanke. If I were a cynic, I would say economists always
leave a door open for them to come in as advisors for if there were simple hard
rules what would be left for economists to do.
What Taylor seems not to have
explicitly taken into account is the time value of money or the principle that
money (cash or borrowed money) should never be cheap, because cheap money leads
to overinvestment, higher government and private sector indebtedness and
overspeculation.
Taylor also appears to be more
concerned whether his rule fits historical macroeconomic data and therefore can be perceived to
have explanatory power or so.
I am also not quite sure
whether Taylor’s Rule always sets interest rate above the current inflation
rate since he uses target inflation and trend GDP.
A Simpler Rule
Thus, a much simpler monetary
policy rule would be to prohibit central banks to set their key short-term interest
rates below inflation plus some factor (e.g. trend rate of GDP growth). This
rule is easy to observe for the markets and for anyone.
I previously introduced this
simpler rule in two other blogs (http://bingelt.blogspot.com/2012/01/us-fed-continues-to-be-reckless.html
& http://bingelt.blogspot.com/2012/07/great-recession-caused-by-reckless.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment