I have asked here before, why is Turkey still a member of NATO. If any NATO member engages in external military operations, the membership should either be suspended or be qualified. What to do about such military operations carried out by the U.S. is another question.
Turkey's military operations in Syria and Iraq could potentially get the whole NATO activated. What is also concerning here is that they are about the Kurdish issue. The treatment of the Kurds by Turkey alone would suggest a review of NATO membership.
"... In Syria, Turkey conducted three military operations (in 2016, 2018, and 2019) that specifically aimed to prevent the formation of politically autonomous regions along the Turkish border controlled by the Kurdish-dominated YPG militants. ... "
" ...Turkey has a long history of cross-border operations inside Iraqi territory that goes back to the 1990s. ...
As of 2019, Turkey had changed strategy and started to seek area control with operations ... Since then, Turkey has maintained a permanent military presence in Northern Iraq that is sustained by a much larger chain of military bases and smaller forward-operation posts along the Iraqi-Turkish border. While numbers are hard to verify, open sources indicate that Turkey has a permanent deployment of 5,000–10,000 soldiers in Iraqi territory. ..."
As of 2019, Turkey had changed strategy and started to seek area control with operations ... Since then, Turkey has maintained a permanent military presence in Northern Iraq that is sustained by a much larger chain of military bases and smaller forward-operation posts along the Iraqi-Turkish border. While numbers are hard to verify, open sources indicate that Turkey has a permanent deployment of 5,000–10,000 soldiers in Iraqi territory. ..."
No comments:
Post a Comment