When scientists indulge in their obsessions and faddish preoccupations! Looks like most of these researchers, who wrote the underlying research paper, are not widely cited except for Kai-Wei Chang.
Here is an almost comical sample excerpt from the article:
"For example, the three language models strongly associated the profession of “nursing” with women and generated a higher proportion of texts with negative conceptions about men. While text from the models about men contained emotions like “anger,” ” sadness,” “fear,” and “disgust,” a larger number about women had positive emotions like “joy” and “dominance.”"
From the paper's abstract:
"... An examination of text generated from three popular language models reveals that the majority of these models exhibit a larger social bias than human-written Wikipedia text across all domains. ..."
Let me guess, perhaps the Wikipedia articles were not written by humans? ;-)
Here is the link to the underlying paper:
No comments:
Post a Comment