Posted: 11/4/2017
Trigger & Motivation
Just recently, I learnt that there was an incredibly high top federal income tax rate of more than 60% as far back as in the early 1930s (What during the Depression?). I remembered there were other times of extremely high income tax rates since the Depression. Then there was a period where the popular narrative has it that the so called super rich (incomes of over $200,000 in 1969) did not pay any federal income taxes and as a consequence, the alternative minimum tax (AMT) was introduced. And much more ...
Is it possible that even the U.S. had significant periods of expropriatory taxes in its history? This would be truly shocking.
The Beginnings
“The origin of the income tax on individuals is generally cited as the passage of the 16th Amendment, passed by Congress on July 2, 1909, and ratified February 3, 1913; however, its history actually goes back even further. During the Civil War Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1861 which included a tax on personal incomes to help pay war expenses. The tax was repealed ten years later. However, in 1894 Congress enacted a flat rate Federal income tax, which was ruled unconstitutional the following year by the U.S. Supreme Court because it was a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each state. The 16th amendment, ratified in 1913, removed this objection by allowing the Federal government to tax the income of individuals without regard to the population of each State.” (Source 3)
The U.S. Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.
A Shocking And Sordid History Of Greedy Politicians
Following table shows major changes to the federal income tax code from 1913 to 2013:
Lowest
|
Highest
| |||||
Income Year
|
Tax Rate
|
Bracket
|
Tax Rate
|
Bracket
|
Max No. Of Brackets
|
Notes
|
2013
|
10%
|
<= $0 - $8,925
|
39.6%
|
> $388,350
|
7
|
Barack Obama
|
2012
|
10%
|
<= $0 - $8,700
|
35%
|
> $388,350
|
6
| |
2004
|
10%
|
<= $0 - $7,150
|
35%
|
> $319,100
|
6
| |
2003
|
10%
|
<= $0 - $7,000
|
35%
|
> $311,950
|
6
| |
2002
|
10%
|
<= $0 - $10,000
|
38.6%
|
> $307,050
|
6
| |
2001
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $22,600
|
39.1%
|
> $297,350
|
5
|
George W. Bush
|
2000
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $21,925
|
39.6%
|
> $288,350
|
5
| |
1997
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $20,600
|
39.6%
|
> $271,050
|
5
| |
1996
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $20,050
|
39.6%
|
> $263,750
|
5
| |
1995
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $19,500
|
39.6%
|
> $256,500
|
5
| |
1994
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $19,000
|
39.6%
|
> $250,000
|
5
| |
1993
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $18,450
|
39.6%
|
> $250,000
|
5
|
William Clinton
|
1992
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $17,900
|
31%
|
> $51,900
|
3
| |
1991
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $17,000
|
31%
|
> $49,300
|
3
|
Confiscatory again! George H. W. Bush
|
1990
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $16,225
|
28%
|
> $19,450
|
2
| |
1989
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $15,475
|
28%
|
> $18,550
|
2
| |
1988
|
15%
|
<= $0 - $14,875
|
28%
|
> $17,800
|
2
|
Hurrah! Best of times have finally returned
|
1987
|
11%
|
<= $0 - $1,500
|
38.5%
|
> $54,000
|
5
| |
1986
|
0%
|
<= $1,835
|
50%
|
> $88,270
|
16
| |
1985
|
0%
|
<= $1,700
|
50%
|
> $85,130
|
16
| |
1984
|
0%
|
<= $1,700
|
50%
|
> $81,800
|
16
| |
1983
|
0%
|
<= $1,700
|
50%
|
> $55,300
|
16
| |
1982
|
0%
|
<= $1,700
|
50%
|
> $41,500
|
14
|
Ronald Reagan
|
1979
|
0%
|
<= $1,700
|
70%
|
> $108,300
|
17
|
Single taxpayer
|
1978
|
0%
|
<= $1,600
|
70%
|
> $182,200
|
34
| |
1977
|
0%
|
<= $1,700
|
70%
|
> $182,000
|
34
|
Jimmy Carter
|
1965
|
14%
|
$0 - $1,000
|
70%
|
> $180,000
|
33
| |
1964
|
16%
|
$0 - $1,000
|
77%
|
> $200,000
|
36
|
John F. Kennedy & Lyndon B. Johnson
|
1955
|
22%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
91%
|
> $300,000
|
26
| |
1954
|
22%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
91%
|
> $200,000
|
26
| |
1953
|
22.2%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
92%
|
> $200,000
|
26
| |
1952
|
22.0%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
91%
|
> $200,000
|
26
| |
1951
|
20.4%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
91%
|
> $200,000
|
24
| |
1946
|
20%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
91%
|
> $200,000
|
24
|
Harry Truman
|
1944
|
23%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
94%
|
> $200,000
|
24
|
World War II. Absolutely insane
|
1942
|
19%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
88%
|
> $200,000
|
24
|
World War II
|
1941
|
10%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
81%
|
> $5,000,000
|
32
|
World War II
|
1936
|
4%
|
$0 - $4,000
|
79%
|
> $5,000,000
|
33
|
Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
1932
|
4%
|
$0 - $4,000
|
63%
|
> $1,000,000
|
55
|
Herbert Hoover
|
1925
|
1.5%
|
$0 - $4,000
|
25%
|
> $100,000
|
23
|
Calvin Coolidge & Andrew Mellon
|
1924
|
2%
|
$0 - $4,000
|
46%
|
> $500,000
|
45
| |
1919
|
4%
|
$0 - $4,000
|
73%
|
> $1,000,000
|
57
| |
1918
|
6%
|
$0 - $4,000
|
77%
|
> $1,000,000
|
56
| |
1917
|
2%
|
$0 - $2,000
|
67%
|
> $2,000,0000
|
21
|
World War I. Woodrow Wilson
|
1916
|
2%
|
$0 - $20,000
|
15%
|
> $2,000,0000
|
16
| |
1913
|
1%
|
$0 - $20,000
|
7%
|
> $500,000
|
7
|
Legend:
- The data focus on lowest and highest brackets irrespective of the how taxpayers were classified by tax code (e.g. married couple filing joint returns or head of household etc.)
- Focus is here is on single taxpayer rates after they were first introduced with income year 1971
- Before income year 1971, focus is on head of household taxes. Head of household was introduced with income year 1952
Some Lessons Learnt
- The U.S. was for most of the years since 1913 a highly socialist country as supported by the historical data of the U.S. federal income taxes. For the land of the free, this is absolutely shocking. That the American people have put up with this without rebellion is incredible. Where was the tea party long ago?
- Urgently needed Constitutional Amendments:
- No tax rate of any major single tax or any combination of major taxes (e.g. sales & income, state and federal etc.) should be allowed to exceed 30%
- Minor taxes should be prohibited (e.g. so called sin taxes, fuel taxes etc.)
- There were only two presidents since 1913 who dared and succeeded in reversing this highly socialist taxation regime: Calvin Coolidge & Ronald Reagan. Both presidents were awarded with incredible economic booms
- The magnificence of the Reagan Revolution becomes even more apparent when looking at the above table
- A great tax reform would be a flat rate federal income tax of only 10% for every income and tax payer
- The extraordinary preferential treatment of married couples filing jointly has been outrageous compared to e.g. single taxpayers. The category of married couples filing jointly should have never been introduced in the tax code! When majorities rule, injustice happens!
Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment