A Bit Of Background
COBRA stands for Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985. As far as its health insurance
portion is concerned it is a prime example of lousy big government legislation
coming out of Washington, DC.
Essentially it allows an employee
to keep his/her employer-sponsored health insurance if a “qualifying event”
like lay off occurs as if the qualifying event did not occur. This coverage is
available for a maximum of up to 18 months. Great idea, but big government is
what it is incapable: monstrosities instead of designing practical, cheap, and free
market solutions.
This law is also a fine
example of what ails the US health care system, where big government has essentially
taken over health care to an extent that it resembles national health care
services like in the UK or Germany.
COBRA Health Insurance Is Very Expensive!
Having been recently laid off
myself, I received the usual notice letter from my former employer about my “right
to continue health care coverage” under COBRA.
The catch: It would cost me
$386 for single and $829 for employee & spouse coverage per month. These
premiums include the employer share as well. While I was employed, I used to
pay $208 per month.
On the market of individual
health insurance, I would be able to obtain health insurance with a similar
coverage for significantly less than $386. My unemployment benefits here in
Arizona are $240 per week (the maximum benefit). What were the legislators in
Washington, DC thinking or smoking to come up with such a lousy law?
Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Is Too
Expensive
Given my example above, it is
clear that at $386 the employer-sponsored coverage was way too expensive
compared with what is available to the individual on the market of individual
health insurance. The company, I worked for was small.
I venture to guess that my
example is typical across the country irrespective of the size of the employer.
Thus, I would presume that health insurance for most employees in the US is
significantly overpriced thanks to this prevalent employer-sponsored group health
insurance system.
Better Solutions
Apart from a fundamental, free
market reform of health care insurance, which I would prefer, federal
legislators have had at least two choices for a more sensible reform:
1. Abolish
the tax deductibility of health insurance for companies or
2. Allow
individuals to enjoy the same kind of tax deductibility as companies
No comments:
Post a Comment