Chinese ophtalmologist Says China Targeted Her for Exposing Origin of COVID-19

I do not know how credible this story is. What is a bit surprising that two ophthalmologists have become whistle blowers about this pandemic according to the article. This article does not explain how the ophthalmologist Ms. Dr. Li-Meng Yan became an expert virologist, a serious and curious omission.

Anyway, the article reiterates that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was also involved with military research potentially in biological weapons. We also know that Anthony Fauci and his ilk financed so called gain of function research at that institute in circumvention of U.S. research restrictions! 

The SARS-CoV-2 virus seems almost too perfect to be natural or zoonotic. Is it a pure coincidence that the virus appears to have spread in Wuhan first? Say they there a wet markets in Wuhan etc. There are wet markets in other Chinese cities as well. Then this leaves e.g. the question was it an intentional or accidental release?
Furthermore, the new virus was from the beginning highly infectious specifically to humans and it is lethal mostly only to very elderly and humans with serious comorbidities! The designers of this virus may have underestimated the latter lethality! The timing of the release is also suspicious as to interfere with the crucial 2020 presidential election in the U.S.
Then, there is e.g. the story about the sudden disappearance of critical virus genome data (see e.g. here) ...

"Yan has a medical degree and a doctorate in ophthalmology from Chinese universities."

From the abstract:

"... The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the relevant research laboratories."

From the body:

"... As a coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 differs significantly from other respiratory and/or zoonotic viruses: it attacks multiple organs; it is capable of undergoing a long period of asymptomatic infection; it is highly transmissible and significantly lethal in high-risk populations; it is well-adapted to humans since the very start of its emergence; it is highly efficient in binding the human ACE2 receptor (hACE2), the affinity of which is greater than that associated with the ACE2 of any other potential host ..."

Virologist Says China Targeted Her for Exposing Origin of COVID-19 

Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route (open access, published 9/14/2020)