Showing posts with label digital person identity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital person identity. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Klarnamenpflicht und EUdi-Wallet: Wie jeder Klick im Internet genehmigungspflichtig wird

Ist das eine maßlose Übertreibung von Tichy Einblick oder was ist dran? Oder ist das ein Fall, wenn einige Deutsche das Gras wachsen hören!

Immer wieder der sog. "gläserne Bürger? Wurde darüber nicht schon seit  über 50 Jahren immer wieder geklagt? Nichts neues!

Warum macht man sich in Deutschland immer noch viele Gedanken darüber seit 1945, während das Thema z.B. in den USA viel unkomplizierter und weniger kontrovers ist?

Klarnamenpflicht und EUdi-Wallet: Wie jeder Klick im Internet genehmigungspflichtig wird "Lange warnte die Polizei vor Klarnamennutzung im Netz. Neuerdings sollen Identitätspflicht und EUdi-Wallet Pflicht werden. Tatsächlich steht der Umbau des Internets zum kontrollierten Zugangsraum für gläserne Bürger bevor. Und da wir alle auf das Internet angewiesen sind, ist das der Weg zur totalen Überwachung"

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

In Defense Of Facial Recognition

Posted: 7/23/2019  Updated: 10/10/2019


Update Of 10/10/2019


I was remiss not to mention that facial recognition could also be successfully and effectively used to provide government services. Apparently, France and Singapore are at the forefront of this endeavor!


“France is poised to become the first European country to use facial recognition technology to give citizens a secure digital identity -- whether they want it or not.” (S1)


Original Post


Facial recognition defined here:  Facial recognition + facial tracking + facial reidentification. Probably, we are missing some, other related tasks here.


Controversy has been building up over this fairly new technology. There are concerns about privacy; abuse by law enforcement; potential for (racial) bias; abuse by authoritarian governments like in China etc. Most of these concerns are rather minor or can easily be ameliorated with time and effort. Some geographic jurisdictions have prematurely chosen to ban it for now. Banning such new technology is certainly a bad choice as if the lessons of history were never learnt.


However, the benefits of this new technology, as usual, most likely will far outweigh its disadvantages.


Some benefits are:
  1. Better evidence against criminals
  2. Better evidence for the innocent accused of crimes etc.
  3. Better evidence against abuse by government officials (incl. law enforcement)
  4. Protection of innocent people from violence or crimes (e.g. fewer opportunities for a crime)
  5. Better chances of recovery of e.g. missing persons or children


What needs to be done? We need a legal framework that greatly reduces the potential for abuse of facial recognition e.g. court approvals, perhaps citizen councils for oversight and so on.


As far as authoritarian regimes like China are concerned, unless the citizens of China protest the omnipresent surveillance and its reported abuses by government authorities, the regime might get away with it.


Sources (S):

  1. French Liberte Tested by Nationwide Facial Recognition ID Plan (10/3/19)