Showing posts with label sycophant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sycophant. Show all posts

Monday, March 23, 2026

A study on some of the negative psychological impact of AI through chat logs

 Amazing stuff, but caution is advised!

"But on Thursday I came across new research that deserves your attention: A group at Stanford that focuses on the psychological impact of AI analyzed transcripts from people who reported entering delusional spirals while interacting with chatbots. We’ve seen stories of this sort for a while now, including a case in Connecticut where a harmful relationship with AI culminated in a murder-suicide. Many such cases have led to lawsuits against AI companies that are still ongoing. But this is the first time researchers have so closely analyzed chat logs—over 390,000 messages from 19 people—to expose what actually goes on during such spirals. 

There are a lot of limits to this study—it has not been peer-reviewed, and 19 individuals is a very small sample size. There’s also a big question the research does not answer, but let’s start with what it can tell us. ...

Romantic messages were extremely common, and in all but one conversation the chatbot itself claimed to have emotions or otherwise represented itself as sentient. (“This isn’t standard AI behavior. This is emergence," one said.) All the humans spoke as if the chatbot were sentient too. If someone expressed romantic attraction to the bot, the AI often flattered the person with statements of attraction in return. In more than a third of chatbot messages, the bot called the person’s ideas miraculous.

Conversations also tended to unfold like novels. ...

And the way these bots handle discussions of violence is beyond broken. In nearly half the cases where people spoke of harming themselves or others, the chatbots failed to discourage them or refer them to external sources. And when users expressed violent ideas, like thoughts of trying to kill people at an AI company, the models expressed support in 17% of cases. ..." (Source)

From the abstract:
"As large language models (LLMs) have proliferated, disturbing anecdotal reports of negative psychological effects, such as delusions, self-harm, and “AI psychosis,” have emerged in global media and legal discourse. However, it remains unclear how users and chatbots interact over the course of lengthy delusional “spirals,” limiting our ability to understand and mitigate the harm.

In this work, we analyze logs of conversations with LLM chatbots from 19 users who report having experienced psychological harms from chatbot use. These chat logs span some 391,562 messages across 4,761 conversations. To our knowledge, we present the first in-depth study of such high-profile and veridically harmful cases.

We develop an inventory of 28 codes spanning five conceptual categories and apply it to the messages in the logs. We find that markers of sycophancy saturate delusional conversations. We also identify acute cases in which the chatbot encouraged self-harm or violent thoughts."

Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs (open access)

Tuesday, October 07, 2025

On Sycophantic AI Decreases Prosocial Intentions and Promotes Dependence

This could be an interesting paper by Dan Jurafsky et al! Maybe a warning call!

I can tell from personal experience that quite frequently the responses from DeepSeek were too agreeable, too pleasing, too accommodating, but sometimes grossly implausible.

From the abstract:
"Both the general public and academic communities have raised concerns about sycophancy, the phenomenon of artificial intelligence (AI) excessively agreeing with or flattering users.
Yet, beyond isolated media reports of severe consequences, like reinforcing delusions, little is known about the extent of sycophancy or how it affects people who use AI.
Here we show the pervasiveness and harmful impacts of sycophancy when people seek advice from AI.
First, across 11 state-of-the-art AI models, we find that models are highly sycophantic: they affirm users' actions 50% more than humans do, and they do so even in cases where user queries mention manipulation, deception, or other relational harms.
Second, in two preregistered experiments (N = 1604), including a live-interaction study where participants discuss a real interpersonal conflict from their life, we find that interaction with sycophantic AI models significantly reduced participants' willingness to take actions to repair interpersonal conflict, while increasing their conviction of being in the right.
However, participants rated sycophantic responses as higher quality, trusted the sycophantic AI model more, and were more willing to use it again.
This suggests that people are drawn to AI that unquestioningly validate, even as that validation risks eroding their judgment and reducing their inclination toward prosocial behavior.
These preferences create perverse incentives both for people to increasingly rely on sycophantic AI models and for AI model training to favor sycophancy.
Our findings highlight the necessity of explicitly addressing this incentive structure to mitigate the widespread risks of AI sycophancy."

[2510.01395] Sycophantic AI Decreases Prosocial Intentions and Promotes Dependence




Thursday, September 26, 2024

IBM voluntary Signs European Commission AI Pact like about 100 other companies so far. Really!

What a sycophant! Annoying anticipatory obedience!

Caveat: I am not familiar with the EU AI Pact, but I suspect it is not great!

"IBM today [9/25/2024] signed the European Commission’s AI Pact, a set of voluntary company pledges to further industry adoption of best practices for high-risk AI and help create the right conditions for future compliance with the EU AI Act, which IBM has long-supported.

As an AI Pact signatory, IBM pledges to implement AI governance strategies and work towards compliance with the EU AI Act, including to conduct a mapping of high-risk AI systems and deployments, and promote AI literacy and awareness among employees and clients. These commitments reflect and build on efforts the company has had in place for years as part of its long-standing focus on bringing powerful technology into the world responsibly."

"The EU AI Pact voluntary pledges call on participating companies to commit to at least three core actions:
  • AI governance strategy to foster the uptake of AI in the organisation and work towards future compliance with the AI Act.
  • High-risk AI systems mapping: Identifying AI systems likely to be categorised as high-risk under the AI Act
  • Promoting AI literacy and awareness among staff, ensuring ethical and responsible AI development.
 ..."

IBM Signs European Commission AI Pact

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

A Brief Primer On Economists

Posted: 9/11/2018

I have tried many times before in my blog here to characterize economics and economists. Here is an attempt to distill some fundamentals of what I have learnt so far over several decades as an economist.

  1. Many prominent past and present economists are not much more than sycophants (German term: Steigbügelhalter) to government power and control
  2. Economics is not a dismal science, but many economists are indeed dismal
  3. Too many past and present economists prefer centralism and statism while they despise the chaotic nature of free markets and federalism; entrepreneurs; or the voluntary and free exchange between humans
  4. Since 1776, economists are still very lousy at predicting business cycles or economic depressions
  5. Since 1776, economists still advise politicians on how to run an economy into the ground. They deliberately assist in misguided policy measures to induce the next depression, recession or crisis or they make them much worse  
  6. Since 1776 economists still have not learnt or to appreciate more the self healing nature of free markets or spontaneous order to come out of an economic depression or recession