Showing posts with label pets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pets. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Dogs may be better at visually interpreting human emotions than anyone expected

Amazing stuff!

I always believed that dogs do not have a good eyesight. "Dogs have lower visual acuity than humans, averaging around 20/75 vision, meaning a dog must be 20 feet away to see an object as clearly as a human can from 75 feet away. While they lack fine detail and full color spectrums, they excel at detecting motion and seeing in dim light." (Google Search)

"In a new study, researchers trained a group of family dogs to lie still inside an MRI machine while showing them pictures of strangers with either happy or neutral expressions. Images of smiling human faces consistently lit up the temporal cortex and caudate nucleus, which are regions of the brain associated with reward and other functions like learning and emotion.
In a second experiment, the researchers showed dogs pictures of people displaying happiness, fear, anger, and sadness.

Analysis of the animals’ brain activity revealed distinct patterns separating fear from anger and sadness, suggesting that dogs can tell the difference between certain negative facial expressions. “Our results suggest that dogs’ brains can differentiate between some facial expressions as distinct categories, rather than merely detecting that one expression is more positive or negative than another,” ..."

From the highlights and abstract:
"Highlights
• Happy human faces elicit right frontotemporal-caudate responses in dogs
• Dog brain response patterns distinguish happiness from negative facial expressions
• Whole-brain response patterns differentiate some pairs of negative facial expressions
• Dog brains represent human facial expressions beyond positive-negative valence

Summary
Dogs can distinguish human facial expressions, particularly happiness, yet brain processes remain unclear.
Using fMRI, we conducted two experiments in awake pet dogs.
In Experiment 1 (n = 8), happy faces elicited a stronger response than neutral faces in a right temporal cluster extending to the caudate nucleus, including the rostral Sylvian gyrus.
In Experiment 2 (n = 12), dogs viewed faces expressing happiness, anger, fear, or sadness.
Using the Experiment 1 cluster as a region of interest, a machine-learning classifier distinguished happiness from each negative facial expression, but not between negative pairs, showing differential BOLD responsiveness to happy faces.
Whole-brain representational similarity analyses revealed activity patterns differentiating angry vs. fearful faces (right mid ectosylvian and left splenial gyri) and sad vs. fearful faces (right rostral suprasylvian gyrus) but not angry vs. sad faces.
This provides direct evidence that dog brains can distinguish between two negative facial expressions."

ScienceAdviser

Dogs can tell if you’re angry, scared, or sad "Our canine companions may really understand what we're going through, new study suggests"



Figure 1 Functional localizer for happy human faces > neutral human faces (n = 8)


Tuesday, December 02, 2025

Roman soldiers helped spread domestic cats across Europe 2,000 years ago

Exciting news for cat lovers! The research abstract itself does not seem to mention Romans, but the study text does.

"Roman soldiers helped spread domestic cats across Europe 2,000 years ago, using them for rodent control along military routes, with cats reaching Britain by 100 CE, according to genome analysis of 70 ancient cats. ..."

From the editor's summary and abstract:
"Editor’s summary
Tracing the origins of domestic cats (Felis catus) has been limited by a lack of ancient DNA for these animals, as well by their morphological similarity to the African wildcat (F. lybica lybica) and European wildcat (F. sylvestris).
De Martino et al. generated low- to medium-coverage genomes for 87 ancient, museum, and modern cats (see the Perspective by Losos). They found that domestic cats are most genetically similar to African wildcats, although there has been widespread gene flow between wild and domestic populations. European samples that cluster with domestic cats only appear in the 1st century CE, suggesting a later dispersal of domestic cats than previously thought. Although broader sampling is needed, this study shows the complexity of population dynamics that is often revealed when looking beyond mitochondrial DNA. ...

Structured Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The domestic cat (Felis catus) originated from the African wildcat (Felis lybica lybica), which is presently distributed across North Africa and the Near East. It has since rapidly expanded to achieve a global distribution. Archaeozoological and iconographic evidence points to two possible centers of domestication: Neolithic Levant ~9500 years ago and Pharaonic Egypt ~3500 years ago.
Ancient mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data support a dual-origin model for cat dispersal, indicating an initial spread from Anatolia to Europe by Neolithic farmers ~6400 years ago, followed by a second wave from Egypt ~2000 years ago.

RATIONALE
The timing and circumstances of cat domestication and dispersal remain uncertain owing to the limited number of ancient and modern genomes analyzed thus far. Questions remain about the natural distribution ranges of African and European (Felis silvestris) wildcats in the past and their potential admixture. A recent study showed that ancient gene flow might confound the reconstruction of cat dispersal, particularly when based on mtDNA. The origin of African wildcat populations in the Mediterranean islands of Sardinia and Corsica is also elusive. Present evidence suggests that they are not feral domestic cats but instead represent a separate wildcat lineage. To address these questions, we analyzed the genomes of 70 ancient cats from archaeological sites across Europe and Anatolia and 17 modern wildcats from Italy (including Sardinia), Bulgaria, and North Africa (Morocco and Tunisia).

RESULTS
We generated a genomic time transect spanning the past 11,000 years and found that cats previously identified as carrying a F. l. lybica mtDNA clade from Neolithic and Chalcolithic southeast Europe and Anatolia, dated between 9500 and 6300 years ago, were F. silvestris wildcats whose ancestors hybridized with F. l. lybica. Ancient genomes revealed an increasing trend of African wildcat ancestry ranging from 9 to 34% eastward, from Bulgaria to central Anatolia.
The earliest cat belonging to the genetic cluster of as F. l. lybica and F. catus in Europe originates from the site of Genoni, in Sardinia (Italy), and is dated to ~2200 years ago. This cat is genetically similar to present-day wildcats in Sardinia, and they all appear to be closely related to a F. l. lybica wildcat from Morocco.
All other archaeological cats from Europe and Anatolia included in the cluster of F. l. lybica and F. catus are dated from ~2000 years ago onward. They possessed the typical gene pool of modern domestic cats and shared more affinities with modern African wildcats than with their Levantine relatives. Their rapid dispersal across the Mediterranean in the past 2000 years marked a demographic expansion recorded in their maternal ancestries.

CONCLUSION
Our findings challenge the commonly held view of a Neolithic introduction of domestic cats to Europe, instead placing their arrival several millennia later. We redefine the timing of cat dispersal by identifying at least two waves of introduction to Europe. The first dispersal most likely featured wildcats from Northwest Africa that were introduced to Sardinia and founded the island’s present-day wild population. A distinct and yet-unknown population in North Africa sourced a second dispersal not later than 2000 years ago that established the gene pool of modern domestic cats in Europe."

"... Phoenicians and later the Punic people established and maintained colonies in Northwest Africa, Sardinia and the southeastern Iberian Peninsula from the 9th c. BCE until their defeat by the Romans in the Third Punic War in 146 BCE (38, 39). Because Sardinia had been under Roman supremacy since 238 BCE (40), the translocation of F. l. lybica to Sardinia could have been carried out by either the Phoenicians and Punic people or by the Romans before the Imperial period starting 27 BCE (41).

Subsequently, since the Roman Imperial era, cats more genetically similar to present-day domestic cats were spread across Europe from a distinct North African population. The earliest sample carrying the ancestry found in present-day domestic cats was dated to 50 cal. BCE-80 cal. CE, from the site of Mautern, in Austria. Cats with this ancestry were then identified in Italy (n=4) and in Roman Imperial military sites along the Danube Limes in Austria and Serbia (n=6) (42–45), confirming previous claims that the Roman army and its entourage played a role in spreading domestic cats to central and eastern Europe (1, 46). This dispersal reached northern Europe relatively early in the Roman Imperial era, as testified by the genome of a cat from the site of Fishbourne, Britain, dated to 24-123 cal. CE (15). The ancestry typical of present-day domestic cats is then found continuously in all cats from Europe and Anatolia from the Byzantine era (n=7), the Medieval (n=23) and post-Medieval periods (n=2) until present-day (Fig. 1D). ..."

Tuesday, December 2, 2025 - Join The Flyover

Roman military helped bring cats to Europe "Military roads helped the felines domesticate about 2,000 years ago."



The introduction of domestic cats to Europe.
The genomes of ancient cats from archaeological sites across Europe and Anatolia (dark circles in the map) revealed that domestic cats were introduced to Europe from North Africa starting at ~2 thousand years ago (kya), several millennia after the onset of the Neolithic in Europe. African wildcats in Sardinia originate from a distinct wildcat population in Northwest Africa.



A cat sits on ruins of the ancient city of Ephesus in present day Izmir, Turkey.


Monday, February 17, 2025

“World’s First” Lab-Grown Meat for sale to Pets Launches in the UK

That's a good idea! How much greenhouse gas producing meat do we actually feed our pets per year? 😊

If our pets like it maybe we can eat it too? Just kidding!

"The treat contains plant-based ingredients and 4% chicken meat cultivated in a lab by Meatly, a London-based startup that last year became the first company in the world to get regulatory approval for this type of meat to be used in pet food.”"

“World’s First” Lab-Grown Meat for Pets Launches in the UK - Human Progress




Wednesday, September 25, 2024

Sony's Aibo, a robotic dog first released in 1999, is enhanced now with AI

Good news!

No more involuntary dog walking. No more cleaning up afterwards! No more grooming.

Will I become a dog owner again now that it is so convenient? 

"Aibo is a friendly robotic dog whose personality and behavior evolves over time. It can recognize its owner's face, detect smiles and words of praise, and learn new tricks. And of course, it loves to be petted."

Aibo - ROBOTS: Your Guide to the World of Robotics


"See Aibo doing some pawsome moves."


Sunday, August 11, 2024

Domestication causes smaller brain size in dogs than in the wolf: Study challenges notion. Really!

Seems plausible to me that lifelong decadence, luxury, and pampering reduces the brain size or deteriorates brain function of domesticated animals unless they are challenged! Happens to healthy humans too with sedentary life styles etc.. 😊 Caution: Satire

Domestication causes smaller brain size in dogs than in the wolf: Study challenges notion

Saturday, August 03, 2024

Thursday, July 18, 2024

Sony Aibo (1999)

Nostalgia! I still remember when it came out! We have come a long way since then!

Sooner than later, we will have robotic companions as pets!

"AIBO (stylized as aibo, abbreviated as Artificial Intelligence RoBOt, homonymous with aibō (相棒), "pal" or "partner" in Japanese) is a series of robotic dogs designed and manufactured by Sony. ..." (Source)

"Aibo is a robotic dog designed to be an "intelligent and trainable robot companion." It walks, barks, whines, growls, wags its tail, and plays with a ball while never requiring owners to clean up after it."

Aibo (1999) - ROBOTS: Your Guide to the World of Robotics

Aibo's first generation cost US $2,100


Thursday, April 04, 2024

Could sharing your bed with your pets be keeping you from getting a good night’s sleep? A rhetorical question?

Also called zoophilia! Why is the Z like zoophilia missing in LGBTQ? Caution: satire.

What do animal rights activists have to say?

Zoophilia has a long history in human art across the world!

Or is it sometimes a form of misanthropy?

"Sleeping with your dog in the same room could be negatively affecting your sleep quality, according to my team’s recently published research in Scientific Reports. ..."

Could sharing a bedroom with your pets be keeping you from getting a good night’s sleep?


Hokusai's (1760–1849) The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife


Sunday, March 10, 2024

Cancer vaccine for dogs almost doubles survival rates in clinical trial

Are our so called best friends becoming guinea pigs for cancer vaccinations? If so, we should be thankful!

"... For the new study, scientists at Yale adapted existing human cancer treatments to find a new version that could benefit both humans and dogs, since some cancers share properties between species. Monoclonal antibodies are an emerging treatment where patients receive infusions of proteins that bind to EGFR and HER2, two proteins that are overexpressed in several cancers like colorectal or breast cancer. ...
After identifying a compound that did just that, the researchers tested it in mice and then dogs. It proved so successful that multiple clinical trials have been conducted in the past eight years, involving over 300 dogs, with the treatment binding to tumors and messing with the pathways that let it grow. ..."

From the abstract:
"Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed on a number of human cancers, and often is indicative of a poor outcome. Treatment of EGFR/HER2 overexpressing cancers includes monoclonal antibody therapy (cetuximab/trastuzumab) either alone or in conjunction with other standard cancer therapies. While monoclonal antibody therapy has been proven to be efficacious in the treatment of EGFR/HER2 overexpressing tumors, drawbacks include the lack of long-lasting immunity and acquired resistance to monoclonal therapy. An alternative approach is to induce a polyclonal anti-EGFR/HER2 tumor antigen response by vaccine therapy. In this phase I/II open-label study, we examined anti-tumor immunity in companion dogs with spontaneous EGFR expressing tumors. Canine cancers represent an outbred population in which the initiation, progression of disease, mutations and growth factors closely resemble that of human cancers. Dogs with EGFR expressing tumors were immunized with a short peptide of the EGFR extracellular domain with sequence homology to HER2. Serial serum analyses demonstrated high titers of EGFR/HER2 binding antibodies with biological activity similar to that of cetuximab and trastuzumab. Canine antibodies bound both canine and human EGFR on tumor cell lines and tumor tissue. CD8 T cells and IgG deposition were evident in tumors from immunized dogs. The antibodies inhibited EGFR intracellular signaling and inhibited tumor growth in vitro. Additionally, we illustrate objective responses in reducing tumors at metastatic sites in host animals. The data support the approach of amplifying anti-tumor immunity that may be relevant in combination with other immune modifying therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors."

Cancer vaccine for dogs almost doubles survival rates in clinical trial

Novel cancer vaccine offers new hope for dogs — and those who love them A Yale researcher developed a vaccine that can slow or halt certain cancers in dogs. And it could be used to treat humans in the future.


Fig. 2 Serum from cEGFR p527 peptide immunized dogs bind EGFR/HER2 on both canine and human cells and osteosarcoma tumor tissue.


Monday, January 22, 2024

Yes, your pet might eat your corpse after you die. That’s a problem for crime investigators

One of those unusual, eye catching, sometimes horror inducing science headlines!

What if the pet owner dies alone of a natural cause?

Getting to know your best friend a little better!

Yes, your pet might eat your corpse. That’s a problem for investigators | Science | AAAS New study aims to help police, forensic pathologists, and others determine whether cats and dogs have interfered with crime scenes



Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Futile veterinary care for pets in the U.S. is widespread, study finds

Something to ponder about! About 50% or more of all U.S. households have an animal companion (Source).

"When faced with terminal illness in their pets, some owners would do anything to prolong their lives.
More than 99% of 474 veterinarians surveyed said they’d encountered useless or nonbeneficial veterinary care in their careers, according to a new Cornell-led study that documents the prevalence of futile care for the first time. ...
The study, co-authored by researchers at Harvard Medical School’s Center for Bioethics, also found that 89% of veterinarians said they had administered futile care, and 42% said it occurs frequently, more than six times per year. ..."

From the abstract:
"OBJECTIVE
To document veterinarians’ perceptions and understanding of medical futility and determine the frequency with which medical futility occurs in small animal practice.
SAMPLE
477 veterinarians in small animal general and specialty veterinary practice.
PROCEDURES
A cross-sectional study was performed with a 25-question, web-based, confidential, anonymous survey distributed through various professional veterinary specialty associations.
RESULTS
Nearly all respondents (469/474 [99.0%]) believed that futile care occurs in veterinary medicine, and 42.4% (201/474) felt it occurred commonly (> 6 times/y). A similar percentage (471/475 [99.2%]) reported encountering futile care within their careers, and 85.0% (402/476) reported encountering it within the past year. A majority (293/477 [61.4%]) reported witnessing futile care occurring in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Most respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed (320/463 [69.1%]) with a statement that providing futile care is always wrong, and only 38 (8.2%) agreed or strongly agreed. Over 70% (329/464 [70.9%]) of respondents agreed that there are situations in which provision of futile care is appropriate.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The importance of reaching a consensus definition for medical futility in veterinary medicine is evident given the frequency with which such care is being provided. Most small animal specialist veterinarians will encounter futile care, and the establishment of an ethical framework to navigate questions surrounding medical futility may help reduce moral distress."

Futile veterinary care is widespread, study finds | Cornell Chronicle

Monday, May 02, 2022

Suspected wolf pack in Colorado turns out to be five escaped St. Bernards dogs

What do escaped human pets to once they are reintroduced into nature by accident or intentionally. This is by far not the first such report over the past several decades. It happens again and again, sometimes with significant negative effects for wildlife!

Who owns five St. Bernards dogs? You need two large refrigerators just to feed them. 😄

"Authorities in Colorado said a suspected pack of wolves caught on camera in unclear footage this week turned out to be five St. Bernard dogs who had escaped from their owner's home.
The Park County Sheriff's Office said it opened an investigation alongside Colorado Parks and Wildlife when a video was shown to authorities depicting a group of four-legged animals running near an elk herd on April 25. ...
The sheriff's office said the dogs "have a documented history of escaping their enclosure in the area."
The owner of the canines is being "cited by Park County Animal Control for permitting a dog to run at large," the sheriff's office said."

Suspected wolf pack in Colorado turns out to be escaped St. Bernards - UPI.com




Monday, April 20, 2015

Doggie Love Adiction

Posted: 4/20/15

Trigger


We learn from the above article (emphasis added):
  1. “Increases in β-endorphin (beta-endorphin), oxytocin and dopamine—neurochemicals associated with positive feelings and bonding—have been observed in both dogs and people after enjoyable interactions like petting, play and talking. Essentially, interacting with a dog, particularly a known dog, can have some of the same psychophysiological markers as when two emotionally attached people spend time together.”
  2. “The new study, by Miho Nagasawa of Azabu University in Japan and colleagues, builds on Nagasawa’s previous work, published in Hormones and Behavior in 2009, that found owners and dogs sharing a long mutual gaze had higher levels of oxytocin in their urine than owners of dogs giving a shorter gaze.”

Pets By The Numbers

According to the Humane Society:
  • “Pet ownership in the U.S. has more than tripled from the 1970s, when approximately 67 million households had pets, to 2012, when there were 164 million [households] owned pets.
    In other words, in 2012, 62 percent of American households included at least one pet.”
  • “83.3 million—Number of owned dogs
  • 47 percent—Percentage of households that own at least one dog”

What is behind this tremendous increase in pet ownership not only in the U.S., but also in other Western countries like Germany?

Is it misanthropy; longing for more loving relationships; are human relationships not fulfilling; a (nostalgic) return to nature; or drug addiction or some combination?

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Animal Rights Activists Are Inconsequent

Trigger


Just read “Free the Elephants and Orcas in Captivity [Editorial]\Such large, intelligent animals suffer when stuffed in a zoo” written by the editors of Scientific American. This topic of poor elephants and Orcas seems to be quite popular in these times. The title of this article speaks for itself.


Another Noble Savage Fantasy


To do good by animals seems to be just that has caught humans’ flight of fancy.


Free All Pets Held By Humans


If you follow the arguments presented by these editors and also animal rights activists you would have to by the same token free all pets currently held by humans for pleasure, entertainment, and companionship.


What about dogs or horses kept as pets, which are intelligent animals too and they used to be roaming around in herds with social behavior etc.


What about intelligent cats?


I am not sure how many animal activists, who are so fashionable and en vogue these days, sincerely propose to free all pets.


What Is Wrong With Keeping Elephants Or Orcas In Captivity?


Briefly, nothing as long as the animals are not harmed, treated fairly, and with respect. Captivity is not per se doing harm to animals.


On the contrary, like with dogs we may learn more about these animals and we may evolve together.


Why do humans condemn animals to live in the wild?


Monday, June 10, 2013

In My Next Life I Want To Be A Dog

This is a blog on the lighter side of life, but with a twist!

A Sign Of Our Times

We don’t have pets, but from time to time we enjoy visiting pet stores. We just did. Every time it is so amazing what is available for dogs or other pets. It’s almost beyond imagination. Pamper or splurge are words much too weak to describe this.

What Is This Affection About?


Is it about our pet, about ourselves or what we miss in our lives? Do we find something in animals we do not find in other humans? Where do we go from here?