Wednesday, May 07, 2025

Transgender therapy or gender affirming care can cause serious health issues to men, but not women

Bad news! Again women (assigned at birth) were excluded! Why?

Is it not curious that this study is only about several hundred men ("assigned male at birth") and no women (assigned female at birth). Again, it is utmost disturbing and presumably deliberately underreported that so many men want the be transgender compared to women. None of the usual disparate impact or gender bias complaints here.

Gender affirming care (or in this case here conversion therapy) is one the most horrific euphemisms of our times! It stands for e.g. double mastectomy or castration!


"Conversion therapy exposure has been linked with elevated blood pressure, increased systemic inflammation, and higher odds of self-reported hypertension diagnosis, finds a cohort study of 703 sexual and gender minority young adults. JAMA Network Open"

From the key points and abstract:
"Key Points
Question
Are exposures to sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts (SOGICE) associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease?

Findings
In this cohort study of 703 sexual and gender minority young adults assigned male at birth, SOGICE exposure was associated with elevated blood pressure, increased systemic inflammation, and higher odds of self-reported hypertension diagnosis.

Meaning
These results suggest that exposure to SOGICE may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, underscoring the need for enforcement of bans and affirmative care approaches.

Abstract
Importance
Sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts (SOGICE), commonly known as conversion therapy, persist across the United States despite having been discredited due to their harmful mental health impact. Understanding the health consequences of SOGICE is critical, particularly for conditions exacerbated by stress, such as cardiovascular disease.

Objective
To investigate the association between SOGICE exposure and cardiovascular disease risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants
This cohort study draws on data from the observational cohort study RADAR, which included sexual and gender minority (SGM) young adults assigned male at birth (AMAB) in Chicago, Illinois. All data for this analysis were collected cross-sectionally during the same study visit for each participant between December 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. Participants who completed SOGICE exposure measures and had cardiovascular health data were eligible; participants with incomplete data were excluded.

Exposure
SOGICE exposure and duration.

Main Outcomes and Measures
Primary outcomes were diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured via automatic monitors, systemic inflammation (SI) assessed through plasma biomarkers, and self-reported hypertension or high blood pressure (HHBP) diagnosis. Regression analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and behavioral covariates.

Results
Among 703 participants (mean [SD] age, 26.75 [4.60] years), 540 (76.8%) identified as cisgender, and 163 (23.2%) identified as transgender or gender diverse. Seventy-two participants (10.2%) reported exposure to SOGICE. Exposed participants had higher SI levels (β = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.17-1.49; P = .02), increased DBP (β = 3.46; 95% CI, 0.60-6.32; P = .02), elevated SBP (β = 4.28; 95% CI, 0.68-7.87; P = .02), and greater odds of self-reported HHBP diagnosis (odds ratio, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.19-3.54; P = .003) compared with nonexposed participants. Associations remained significant after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusions and Relevance
In this cohort study of SGM young adults AMAB, exposure to SOGICE was associated with adverse cardiovascular health indicators, including elevated DBP and SBP, increased SI, and higher odds of self-reported HHBP. These findings underscore the need for public health and policy interventions to enforce and strengthen bans on SOGICE practices. Recognizing the cardiovascular health consequences of SOGICE contributes to addressing SGM health disparities and emphasizes the importance of affirmative care approaches that prioritize the well-being of SGM individuals."

Global Health NOW: Redrawing Battle Lines in the AIDS Fight; Twists in Abortion Lawsuit; and The Lifesaving Potential of Self-Driving Cars

No comments:

Post a Comment